My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING AGENDA PACKET 9-1-26
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2026
>
090126 REGULAR
>
CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING AGENDA PACKET 9-1-26
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/27/2026 2:46:40 PM
Creation date
8/27/2026 2:41:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
9/1/2026
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
348
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Lisjan Nation ATTACHMENT 5 <br />Public Comments <br /> <br /> <br />4 <br /> <br />From: Lisjan Nation <br />Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2026 12:04 PM <br />To: Shweta Bonn <sbonn@cityofpleasantonca.gov> <br />Cc: Derek Farmer <DFarmer@cityofpleasantonca.gov> <br />Subject: Re: Requesting Consultation <br /> <br />Hi Shweta, <br /> <br />Thank you very much. We ask that the Tribe's comments be incorporated into the report for <br />the City Council and would like to reiterate the importance of meaningful, government-to- <br />government Tribal consultation at the time of development project review, especially for <br />the 4100 First Street site due to its proximity to the arroyo. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />'Uni (Respectfully), <br /> <br />Lucy Beyhan, Cultural Resource Manager II <br />Confederated Villages of Lisjan Nation <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />On Wed, Jul 29, 2026 at 11:04 AM Shweta Bonn <sbonn@cityofpleasantonca.gov> wrote: <br /> <br />Lucy, <br /> <br />Thank you for your email. The City reached out to Native American Tribes since the <br />contemplated rezonings affect the land use designations in the Downtown Specific Plan <br />and the General Plan, pursuant to Senate Bill 18 and Assembly Bill 52, and appreciates the <br />Tribe's continued engagement. <br /> <br />As you noted, the rezonings themselves do not result in excavation or development of the <br />site. We understand that the Tribe would like consultation at the time of development <br />Page 318 of 344
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.