Planning Commission Agenda Packet 09092026

City of Pleasanton—Additional Housing Sites Rezonings Project CEQA Guidelines Section 15164 Addendum Addendum 61 Proposed Project Analysis and Conclusion As previously mentioned, the Prior FEIR indicated that the City contains several archaeological resource sites. The proposed sites have been previously developed and do not contain known archaeological resources. However, future development consistent with the proposed project could impact known archaeological resources and/or previously unidentified or undesignated archaeological resources that could exist within the proposed sites. Consistent with the conclusions of the Prior FEIR, future development of the proposed sites would be required to comply with applicable adopted State, federal, and local laws to protect archaeological resources. Implementation of applicable General Plan programs and policies, such as Program 5.1 to 5.3 and Policy 1, Municipal Code Section 18.140.030, and project-specific environmental review would ensure that impacts to archaeological resources would be less than significant. Therefore, the proposed project would not result in a new or more severe adverse impact that was not previously identified and disclosed in the Prior FEIR. No further analysis is required. c) Burial Sites Would the project: Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? Summary of Prior FEIR The Prior FEIR did not present a separate impact discussion for human remains, but it expressly noted that many prehistoric villages in the Planning Area also contain human remains and that historic sites in the area may include graves and cemeteries. It also relied on the City’s standard condition requiring work stoppage and qualified professional evaluation if prehistoric or historic artifacts or other indications of cultural resources are discovered during excavation. The Prior FEIR determined that future ground disturbance could encounter buried prehistoric resources, including places that may contain human remains, but existing laws, CEQA procedures, and the City’s standard stop-work condition would reduce impacts to a less than significant level at the program scale. The Prior FEIR concluded that impacts would be less than significant. Proposed Project Analysis and Conclusion The project sites are developed and therefore unknown burials are not expected to be located on-site. Nonetheless, consistent with the conclusions of the Prior FEIR, future development of the proposed sites would be required to comply with the applicable provisions of existing laws, CEQA procedures,