My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Planning Commission Agenda Packet 09092026
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2020 - PRESENT
>
2026
>
09-09
>
Planning Commission Agenda Packet 09092026
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/10/2026 12:59:11 PM
Creation date
9/10/2026 12:50:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
9/9/2026
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
1218
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City of Pleasanton—Additional Housing Sites Rezonings Project <br />Addendum CEQA Guidelines Section 15164 Addendum <br /> <br /> <br />98 <br />Design (LID) features such as bioretention. On-site stormwater management <br />systems would be designed with project site conditions, such as flood hazard <br />zones, taken into account. Further, because the proposed sites contain <br />existing development, future redevelopment projects would likely improve <br />the stormwater conditions through compliance with the most up-to-date <br />stormwater system standards. Further, preparation of a stormwater <br />management plan would ensure that developments on the proposed sites <br />are designed to reduce the risk of flooding and impeded or redirected flood <br />flows. <br />Compliance with the Municipal Code, the General Plan, and NPDES permits <br />would ensure that stormwater and drainage patterns are sufficiently <br />managed such that water quality is not significantly degraded. Therefore, <br />impacts would be less than significant, and the proposed project would not <br />result in a new or more severe adverse impact that was not previously <br />identified and disclosed in the Prior FEIR. No further analysis is required. <br />b) Groundwater <br />Would the project: Substantially decrease groundwater supplies or interfere <br />substantially with groundwater recharge such that the project may <br />impede sustainable groundwater management of the basin? <br />Summary of Prior FEIR <br />Water supplies for the City are managed by Zone 7 of the Alameda County <br />Flood Control and Water Conservation District (Zone 7). Roughly 20 percent <br />of Zone 7’s water supply is groundwater. Zone 7 acquires more than 80 <br />percent of its raw water supply from the California State Water Project (SWP), <br />a multi-purpose water storage and delivery system comprised of canals, <br />pipelines, reservoirs, and hydroelectric power facilities that extends more <br />than 705 miles. SWP surface water is treated at the Patterson Pass Water <br />Treatment Plant (PPWTP) and the Del Valle Water Treatment Plant (DVWTP) <br />and is conveyed through a network of Zone 7 Water Agency transmission <br />pipelines to the City’s service areas and other retail customers. According to <br />the Prior FEIR, the Zone 7 Water Agency has adopted a Water Supply <br />Reliability Policy to maintain the ability to meet 100 percent of Zone 7’s <br />estimate for treated water demands for 100 percent of the time; as such, <br />and given compliance with applicable General Plan policies and the <br />voluntary and mandatory water conservation requirements during water <br />shortages established in Chapter 9.30 of the City’s Municipal Code, the Prior <br />FEIR concluded that impacts related to groundwater supply and recharge <br />would be less than significant.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.