My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Planning Commission Agenda Packet 09092026
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2020 - PRESENT
>
2026
>
09-09
>
Planning Commission Agenda Packet 09092026
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/10/2026 12:59:11 PM
Creation date
9/10/2026 12:50:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
9/9/2026
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
1218
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City of Pleasanton—Additional Housing Sites Rezonings Project <br />CEQA Guidelines Section 15164 Addendum Addendum <br /> <br /> <br /> 123 <br />Environmental Issue <br />Area <br />Prior FEIR <br />Determination <br />New or More <br />Severe <br />Impacts? <br />New <br />Circumstances <br />Involving New or <br />More Severe <br />Impacts? <br />New <br />Information <br />Requiring <br />New Analysis <br />or <br />Verification? <br />Applicable <br />Mitigation <br />Measures <br />XVII. Transportation <br />Would the project: <br />a) Conflict with a <br />program plan, <br />ordinance or policy <br />of the circulation <br />system, including <br />transit, roadway, <br />bicycle and <br />pedestrian <br />facilities? <br />Less than <br />significant <br />impact <br />No No No None <br />b) Conflict or be <br />inconsistent with <br />CEQA Guidelines <br />Section 15064.3, <br />subdivision (b)? <br />Significant <br />and <br />unavoidable <br />impact <br />(Impact AQ- <br />1) <br />No No No None <br />c) Substantially <br />increase hazards <br />due to a geometric <br />design feature <br />(e.g., sharp curves <br />or dangerous <br />intersections) or <br />incompatible uses <br />(e.g., farm <br />equipment)? <br />Less than <br />significant <br />impact <br />No No No None <br />d) Result in <br />inadequate <br />emergency <br />access? <br />Less than <br />significant <br />impact <br />No No No None <br /> <br />The following analysis is based on the Transportation Assessment prepared for <br />the proposed project by Fehr & Peers, dated February 26, 2026 (Appendix C).
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.