Planning Commission Agenda Packet 09092026

City of Pleasanton—Additional Housing Sites Rezonings Project Addendum CEQA Guidelines Section 15164 Addendum 124 a) Affect to Circulation System Would the project: Conflict with a program plan, ordinance or policy of the circulation system, including transit, roadway, bicycle and pedestrian facilities? Summary of Prior FEIR The Prior FEIR evaluated impacts to the circulation system primarily through Level of Service (LOS) standards, congestion management policies, and multimodal planning goals. Buildout of the General Plan would add traffic to both local and regional roadway networks; however, these increases were anticipated in regional planning documents and were evaluated using the City’s traffic model and Countywide Travel Demand Model. The General Plan includes a comprehensive Circulation Element emphasizing roadway improvements, multimodal connectivity, and transportation demand management strategies. It specifically promotes transit access, bicycle and pedestrian mobility, and integration of land use with transportation planning. The Prior FEIR found that development would not conflict with adopted policies for transit or active transportation and would instead improve transit access and amenities. The Prior FEIR concluded that impacts related to conflicts with transportation plans and policies would be less than significant. Proposed Project Analysis and Conclusion Future development consistent with the proposed project would contribute to and increase the use of transit, bicycle, and pedestrian facilities in the City. The proposed project is not forecast to generate transit, bicycle, or pedestrian use that would exceed the capacity of area facilities to serve that demand. Development consistent with the proposed project would be required to adhere to all applicable federal, State, and local policies related to the circulation systems, including General Plan goals, policies, and programs, as well as applicable regulations in the Hacienda Design Guidelines. Consistent with the Prior FEIR, the implementation of the proposed project would be subject to all applicable City guidelines, standards, and specifications, and, as such, the proposed project would not conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs. Therefore, impacts would remain less than significant, and the proposed project would not result in a new or more severe adverse impact that was not previously identified and disclosed in the Prior FEIR. No further analysis is required.