Laserfiche WebLink
2026 PLEASANTON BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN MASTER PLAN | 91 <br />IMPLEMENTATIONTable 5: Project Prioritization Criteria and Weights <br />Criteria Evaluation Metric Points Criteria Points <br />Safety Presence of fatal/severe injury crash(es) <br />Located on Focused Pedestrian High Injury <br />Corridors and Focused Bicycle High Injury <br />Corridors7 <br />10 <br />Safe Routes to <br />School (SRTS)Project located in proximity to school Within ¼ mile of a school 10 <br />Within ½ mile of a school 5 <br />Access to <br />Destinations/ <br />Connection <br />Across Barriers <br />Located in high trip potential location (70-85 compos- <br />ite score)8, <br />Improves a connection across a major barrier (e.g. <br />artierial, freeway, ramp, or rail tracks, <br />Connects to a trail <br />All 3 criteria met 8 <br />Meets at least 2 criteria 6 <br />Meets at least 1 criteria 4 <br />Comfort Closes a gap or improves comfort of facility by im- <br />proving Level of Traffic Stress (LTS)8 <br />Closes gap or provides Low Stress Facility 8 <br />One better LTS 6 <br />Partial LTS improvement 4 <br />Equity Concentration of disadvantage populations by Area <br />Median Income (AMI)9 <br />Census Block Below 80% of Alameda County <br />AMI 8 <br />Census Block Below 80% of Alameda County <br />AMI (but above 80% of County AMI)4 <br />Cost <br />High-level cost tier based on improvement type. <br />• Bike: Low < $500K, Medium between $500k and <br />$1M, High > $1M <br />• Pedestrian: Low ~ $10K e.g. signing/striping/sig- <br />nal timing change, Medium between $100-250K <br />e.g. concrete/minor utility, High ~$500K e.g. signal <br />modification/curb changes <br />Low 6 <br />Low-Medium 4 <br />High-Medium 3 <br />High 2 <br />Sources: <br />7Pleasanton Travel Action Plan, 2026 <br />8Needs Assessment and Recommendation Memorandum developed by Toole Design Group <br />9U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, 2025. AMI for Alameda County for 2025 is $159, 800 and for the City of Pleasanton is $190,124. <br />Detailed prioritization methodology and scoring of individual projects is provided in Appendix B.