Laserfiche WebLink
92 | 2026 PLEASANTON BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN MASTER PLAN <br />IMPLEMENTATION <br />Corridor Ranking <br />Individual bicycle and pedestrian projects were grouped into focus network corridors to identify corridor-level investment priorities. <br />Table 6 summarizes the corridor evaluation results. Community priorities were generally aligned with the technical evaluation. Corri- <br />dors receiving the highest technical scores also tended to receive the strongest public support. <br />While the corridor ranking provides a data-driven framework for comparing potential investments, rankings should be consid - <br />ered within the context of each corridor’s unique characteristics. Some corridors ranked highly due to factors such as proximity to <br />schools, access to major destinations, existing network gaps, or lower implementation costs. Conversely, some corridors with im- <br />portant citywide or regional connections ranked lower due to recently implemented improvements, higher implementation costs, or <br />other factors in the evaluation criteria. Furthermore, for lengthy corridors, if some study segments or intersections received lower <br />scores, the overall corridor score was reduced.