SR 05:062 - Laserfiche WebLink

curreOt data and information included in the most recent existing air quality report and r~ lated monitoring reports for ALRRF. 92.3 Possil~le CEQA Review Due to Substantial Noncompliance. In the event the Boarc finds that there has been substantial noncompliance by the operator with any o'the permit conditions during the five-year period under review, the County may, .in addition to any other recourse the County may have, and provided that such action is allowed pursuant to Public Resources Code section 21166 and sections 15162 through 15164 of the CEQA Guidelines or any other applicable prow~ons of CEQA, require CEQA review of the non-complying operations prior !o any approval of the continuation of such activities. 92.4 PosSible CEQA Review Due to Substantial Changes or Significant New Information. Consistent with the provisions of CEQA, including Public Reso~ces Code section 21166 and sections 15162 through 15164 of the CEQA Guidelines, the County shall require additional CEQA review if, and to the extent, the County finds, based on substantial evidence, that further CEQA review is requi~ed pursuant to the terms of Public Resources Code section 21166, and sectic as 15162 through 15164 of the CEQA Guidelines or any other applicable provi~ ions of CEQA. 93. Augmented loard of Supervisors Permit Compliance Review Prior to Mid-Capacity Buildout Poi lt. During that Five Year Compliance Review which is closest in time but prior to that date which the operator projects that fifty percent (50%) of the total approved cqpacity ,of the ALRRF expansion will be filled (the "Mid-Capacity ComplianceReview '), the County shall conduct a more intensive review of ALRRF's compliance ¢ith this permit and based solely on that permit compliance review shall specifically ~eview whether the operator should be allowed to continue operation of the ALRRF and fill the remaining fifty percent (50%) of the total approved capacity of ALRRF. In addition to the requirements for Five Year Reviews set forth in Condition No. 92 above, during the Mid-Capacity Review, the Board of Supervisors shall determine whether ALi ~RF may continue operations after fifty percent (50%) of ALRRF's total approved cal~acity has been filled based solely upon its determination that the following conditions h~ve been met: (a) the ol~erator has requested continued operation of ALRRF; i (b) ALR1 IF is in compliance with all the conditions of this permit; and (c) there ~s a demonstrated need for continued operation of the ALRRF based upon consi~ leration of the availability of other technologies or programs for source I reducion, reuse or recycling, existing or projected or contracts franchise agree: nents for disposal of solid waste at the ALRRF, and the existence of a mark~ for solid waste disposal in the area, provided that this Mid-Capacity Comltliance Review may not base any need finding upon the availability of space at ann other solid waste landfills that do or could compete with the ALRRF. 27-B Final Altamont Settlement - Exhibit B