My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
SR 06:033
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2006
>
SR 06:033
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/2/2006 3:48:58 PM
Creation date
2/2/2006 3:35:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
2/7/2006
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
SR 06:033
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
137
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Home Owners Association and a number of surrounding property owners requesting a Zoning <br />Administrator hearing. <br /> <br />V. PUBLIC CORRESPONDENCE <br /> <br />At the time this staff report was written, 25 comments were received pertaining to this large <br />family daycare application (Attachment No.4, Exhibit C). The correspondences were in forms <br />of phone conversations, e-mails, and a report. Staff interacted with the concerned parties and <br />attempted to negotiate remedies to the issues that were raised. However, staff was unable to <br />alleviate the concerns about the facility use, parking, and traffic impacts. <br /> <br />Twenty-four (24) statements are from adjacent neighbors to the site, owners/residents within the <br />development, or residents within close proximity to the development. <br /> <br />The concerns ranged from the parking and traffic impacts, safety as a result of speeding, <br />increased traffic, as well as noise. All concerned parties expressed objection to the request for <br />an expanded facility at this location and request that the Planning Commission deny the <br />application. <br /> <br />A report was assembled by the Valencia neighborhood to explain and demonstrate their <br />opposition to the project. The report is attached to this report as part of the public <br />correspondences. <br /> <br />One (I) correspondence was received in support ofthe application, which noted the need for <br />such childcare facilities to be located within neighborhoods and explained the reality of the <br />traffic and parking situation. <br /> <br />VI. FINDINGS <br /> <br />The Planning Commission needs to make the following use permit findings prior to approving a <br />large family daycare home. These findings must relate to the specific proposal being made. <br /> <br />1. The location of the proposed conditional use is in accordance with the objectives of the <br />zoning ordinance and the purpose of the district in which the site is located. <br /> <br />- The subject site is in a PUD- HDR (Planned Unit Development- High Density <br />Residential) zoning district. Chapter 18.68 of the Pleasanton Municipal Code (PUD <br />Planned Unit Development District) states that planned unit development zoning <br />districts are created to encourage imagination and housing variety (size and design) to <br />provide areas for high density residential use and to be consistent with sound standards <br />of public health and safety. The State legislature declares that large family daycare <br />homes should meet other requirements specifically designed to promote the fire and life <br />safety of the children. <br /> <br />Case No. PDUP-8 <br /> <br />Planning Commission <br /> <br />Page 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.