My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
SR 06:060
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2006
>
SR 06:060
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/2/2007 4:06:08 PM
Creation date
2/15/2006 4:39:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
2/21/2006
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
SR 06:060
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
385
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Draft Conditions of Approval <br />Comments from Cannon Design Group <br />Housing Commission Meeting Minutes <br />(excerpts) <br />Draft Affordable Housing Agreement <br />. Planning Commission Workshop Minutes <br />(excerpts) <br />Exhibit G: Initial Study <br />Exhibit H: Bernal Commercial Project Traffic Report <br />Exhibit I: Neighbors' Comments <br />Location Map <br /> <br />Exhibit B: <br />Exhibit C: <br />Exhibit D: <br /> <br />Exhibit E: <br />Exhibit F: <br /> <br />I. BACKGROUND <br /> <br />On October 26, 2005, the Planning Commission conducted a workshop on the proposed project <br />(see attached minutes). The Planning Commission indicated that they would like the following <br />items addressed when it returns to the Commission: <br /> <br />. The Commission felt that the site was already constrained; thus, they could not see how <br />additional units could be supported in answer to the Housing Commission request to add <br />more. The Commission indicated that a slight reduction might be preferred. <br />. The proposed tot lot was desired but adequate landscaping is needed to perhaps provide <br />screening to the neighbor. No additional amenities were thought required. <br />. The Commission felt the design is appropriate. Minor justification is needed to the <br />proposed window awnings. <br />. The Commission recommends that the details of the vegetated swale be reviewed by <br />Engineering Department. <br />. The Commission expressed concerns on the removal of existing trees, and they request <br />that the trees along the Arroyo Del Valle be retained. <br />. The Commission expressed concerns on traffic, adequate on site parking, guest parking <br />and its enforcement. <br />. The Commission recommended that the structures be solar ready with all conduits in <br />addition to house fans being installed. <br /> <br />Silverstone has made several modifications to the plans responding to the workshop and <br />comments from Larry Cannon, the City's consulting peer review architect. Other supplemental <br />reports/studies have also been completed and are attached to the staff report. <br /> <br />Case No. PUD-49 <br /> <br />Planning Commission <br /> <br />Page - 2 - <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.