My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 020905
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2005
>
PC 020905
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/5/2017 3:19:49 PM
Creation date
3/9/2006 9:04:04 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
2/9/2005
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 020905
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
7_ MATTERS INITIATED BY COMMISSION MEMBERS <br />a_ Discussion on Temuorarv and Permanent Window Si~na~e <br />This item was continued to the meeting of February 23, 2005_ <br />Unliahtina in Residential Neighborhoods <br />Commissioner Fox requested that standards regarding uplighting in residential <br />neighborhood be examined. <br />Commissioner Roberts noted that a business office building in Sunol Boulevard had <br />security lighting that was not hooded and noted that was sometimes an issue in houses as <br />well. <br />Mr_ Pavan noted that he would direct the project planner to ensure that the lighting <br />conformed to the original conditions of approval- <br />Planning Items on the Website <br />Commissioner Fox advised that the City of Dublin included a listing of all Cseneral Plan <br />Amendments on its website as well as a list of current projects and their plaaaers_ She <br />suggested that the City of Pleasanton include similar items on its website_ <br />Noticing <br />Commissioner Fox would like the noticing process to be examined and inquired whether <br />it would be possible for the items to be available sooner for public and Commission <br />examination. <br />Ms_ Nerland advised that by State law, the notices were sent out 1 O days before the <br />meeting date to all property owners and residents within 300-feet of the project site_ <br />Commissioner Roberts noted that the Post Office did not always update new streets for <br />noticing. <br />S CODln~ SeSSlOn <br />Commissioner Fox advised that she would not be able to attend the EIR Scoping Session <br />for the Spotorno Ranch_ <br />In response to Commissioner Blank's inquiry whether the joint meetings could be held on <br />alternate Wednesdays instead of on Tuesdays, Commissioner Roberts noted that the <br />Chambers was used by other Commissions on the Wednesdays not scheduled for the <br />Planning Commission meetings. She added that Planning Commissioners were invited to <br />the meeting but that attendance was not raquircd_ <br />Ms_ Decker advised that staff would work to find an alternate date if possible. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES February 9, 2005 Page 20 of-22 <br />_____T _..__._ __.. _._.. ... ..._ _. _. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.