Laserfiche WebLink
r'- Action Plan <br /> <br /> Tri-Valley Action Plan <br /> Highways---Contra Costa County Version <br /> <br /> Key Locations <br /> <br /> Facility: Sycamore Valley Road East'of 1-680 <br /> <br /> Existing Configuration 4 lanes <br /> Existing Volume~ 1,800 <br /> Existing V/C 0.50 <br /> <br /> 2010 Expected Network <br />F" Planned changes: None <br /> <br /> 2010 Configuration 4 lanes <br />,r-' volume 2,360 <br /> Transit Service (buses/hour both di~ 8 <br /> rections) <br /> Transit Ridership (peak hour) 58 <br />r"' V/C constrained [before Action Plan] 0.65 (0.65) <br /> (unconstrained) <br /> <br />r" Traffic Pattern Danville 44% <br /> San Ramon 2% <br /> CCC 48% <br /> <br />r, Livermore 6% <br /> Pleasanton 0% <br /> Dublin 0% <br /> <br /> r"' TSO to be achieved V/C < 0.90 at inter- <br /> section. <br /> <br />F' Recommended Actions In order to meet the TSO requirements, the level of development that may be <br /> approved by a local jurisdiction shall be consistent with the identified transportation <br /> improvements and programs for which funding is reasonably assured. Other <br /> jurisdictions may elect not to implement such improvements and programs within <br /> r" their jurisdiction, and the minimum level of service may then be exceeded without <br /> violating the TSO. <br /> <br /> F"' PM Peak-Hour 2010 Expecled Intersection LOS Without Action Plan <br /> V/C LOS <br /> <br />r" Sycamore Valley Road and San Ramon Valley Boulevard 0.81 D <br />~ Sycamore Valley Road and 1-680 SB Ramps 0.63 B <br /> Sycamore Valley Road and 1-580 NB Ramps 0.79 C <br /> Sycamore Valley Road and Camino Tassajara 0.37 A <br />~r' Sycamore Valley Road and Brookside Drive 0.47 A <br /> <br />F' <br /> <br />F' Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc. 173 <br /> <br /> <br />