My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
RES 95024X
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
1990-1999
>
1995
>
RES 95024X
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/2/2012 11:10:33 AM
Creation date
2/25/1999 5:48:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
2/21/1995
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
335
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
-T'c / <br /> IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS <br /> OF <br /> CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA <br /> <br />SUBJECT: In the Mailer of the Evaluation ) <br /> of the Tri Valley Transportation ) <br /> ~lanlAction Plan. 2rid Draft I <br /> RESOLUTION NO, 94138.__7 <br /> <br />The Board of Supervisors of ConIra Costs County RESOLVES THAT: <br /> WHEREAS, the Measure C-1968 Growth Management Program (Measure C-198B) compliance <br />requirements for Regional Routes requires each jurisdiction to implement specified local actions designed to <br />attain Traffic Service Objectives {'rSO's) in a timely manner, consistent with adopted Action Plans: <br /> WHEREAS, the Draft Tri Valley Transportation Plan/Action Plan, 2rid Draft (Draft Action Plan), <br /> proposes local actions that include growth controls and prohibits certain transportation improvements that, <br /> coupled with the Level of Service TSO's, would preempt local land use decisions on proposals that are <br /> currently under review by the Board of Supervisors; <br /> WHEREAS Measure C-1998 compliance requirements cannot preempt local land use decisions or <br /> require local jurisdictions to accept unwanted construction projects; <br /> WHEREAS the Draft Action Plan includes 8 TSO for Boilingot Canyon Road that is not consistent with <br /> the minimum Level of Service standard required for development in the Dougharty Valley; <br /> WHEREAS the Draft Action Plan includes statements interpreting the Dougherty Valley Settlement <br /> Agreement that 8re inconsistent with the interpretation of the Board of Supervisors; <br /> WHEREAS the Draft Action Plan does not substantiate at this time that the actions it recommends <br /> or potential actions, will reasonably ensure compliance with the TSO's in 2010; <br /> WHEREAS the Draft Action Plan does not provide an adequate nexus between the recommended <br /> regional fees to be paid by new development in ConIra Coste with the benefit These fees provide such <br /> developmenu; <br /> WHEREAS various other actions in the Draft Action Plan do not reflect the Board's concerns in <br /> managing regiona~ traffic impacts from future growth in the Tri Valley area; <br /> WHEREAS ell affected jurisdictions must agree to the actions before the Action Plans are finalized <br /> and adopted; and <br /> WHEREAS this resolution doe-; not conflict with the condition included in the ConIra Costs <br /> Transporletion Authority's july 20, 1994 approval on the County's Measure C-1988 Annual Compliance <br /> Checklist regarding the application of certain traffic level of service standards for intersection in Danvilla and <br /> San Rsmon. <br /> NOW. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of ConIra Costs County to support <br /> ~he following modifications to the Draft Action Plan: <br /> Recommended actions for growth limits outside the Dougharty Valley Specific Plan area shall be <br /> deleted trom the Action Plan; <br /> Recommended prohibitions to road improvements in Danvilla shell be deleted trorn the Action PLan <br /> end replaced with a process for meeting TSO's that will not impose an unwanted construction project <br /> in Danvilla or lxeempt t:,cel land use dec:signs on proposals that era currently urntier review by the <br /> Board of Supervisors. 1'his process for meeting TSO's should be defined as follows: <br /> In order to meet the TSO requirements, the level of develol~ment that may be <br /> approved by a local jurisdiction shall be consistent with the identified <br /> transportation improvements and programs for which funding is reasonably <br /> assured. Other jurisdictions may elect not to implement such imprbvements <br /> and programs within their jurisdic lion, end the minimum L · vel o f Service may <br /> then be exceeded without violating the TSO. <br /> <br /> RESOLUTION NO. 94/LB7_ ~ <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.