My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
RES 95024X
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
1990-1999
>
1995
>
RES 95024X
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/2/2012 11:10:33 AM
Creation date
2/25/1999 5:48:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
2/21/1995
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
335
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Plan Implementation, Monitoring, and Review <br /> <br /> The TVTC has not addressed the issue of whether an environmental impact report will <br /> be required for plan adoption. If an EIR is necessary, it should be jointly prepared by <br /> all jurisdictions, rather than prepared individually. -- <br /> <br /> Plan Financing <br /> <br /> Two elements of the f'mancing plan for the TVTP require further study and action by <br /> the Tri-Valley Transportation Council and its member jurisdictions: the subregional <br /> transportation impact fee, and the cost-sharing formulae for road improvements that <br /> benefit multiple jurisdictions. <br /> <br /> Subregional Transportation Impact Fee. The TVTP lists the full range of projects that <br /> could be included in an impact fee progrnn~. First, the list needs to be finalized and <br /> adopted. Next, the details of the impact fee program need to be worked out. The <br /> following issues should be considered. <br /> <br /> 1. How many development categories and what fee for each? <br /> <br /> 2. How would the fee affect growth? <br /> <br /> 3. Are there any exempted areas or land use types? <br /> <br /> 4. When will the fees be collected? <br /> <br /> 5. When will they be spent? <br /> <br /> 6. Who will act as banker? <br /> <br /> 7. What is the priority for constructing impact fee projects? <br /> <br /> 8. Are interim fee measures needed while the above issues are resolved? <br /> After these issues have been resolved and the program specified, each jurisdiction <br /> needs to adopt the program. <br /> <br /> Shared Facilities. Implementation of much of the planned arterial system will be the <br /> direct responsibility of new development. Many of the arterials, however, are shared <br /> among jurisdictions. Table 8-8 shows the jurisdictions sharing responsibility for each <br /> of the planned improvements that will be paid for directly by developers. <br /> <br /> For each of these improvements, a negotiated agreement needs to be reached about <br /> cost sharing between jurisdictions. The cost-sharing approach could be based on which <br /> jurisdiction's traffic is expected to use the facility, or it could be based simply on the <br /> boundaries within which the facility lies, or a combination. These agreements should <br /> be negotiated in advance so that when development takes place, the responsibility for <br /> road improvements is clear. <br /> <br />Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc. 234 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.