My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
RES 95024X
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
1990-1999
>
1995
>
RES 95024X
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/2/2012 11:10:33 AM
Creation date
2/25/1999 5:48:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
2/21/1995
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
335
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Plan Implementation, Monitoring, and Review <br /> <br /> Monitoring Transportation Service Objectives <br /> <br /> The Transportation Service Objectives (TSOs) are the heart of the TVTP. While <br /> certain growth assumptions are a part of the plan, they serve merely to guide the <br /> specification of a planned transportation system and financing program. The TVTP <br /> does not control growth directly but indirectly through the TSOs. <br /> <br /> Under existing conditions, the TSOs relatihg to freeway and intersection levels of <br /> service are largely being met. Future growth should be matched with road improve- <br /> ments so that the TSOs continue to be met. Achievement of the TSOs depends upon <br /> successful implementation of the actions, measures, and progr3ms set forth in <br /> Chapter 9, "Action Plan." <br /> <br /> In Contra Costa County, if, following good faith implementation of the Action Plan, a <br /> TSO is not met, then the Plan would need to be reevaluated through the forum of <br /> TVTC and SWAT. Amendments to the Plan could include a relaxation of TSOs, a <br /> strengthening of actions, or a combination of these approaches. In Alameda County, <br /> the jurisdiction with the TSO violation can elect to modify growth rates, improve the <br /> facility, or seek a lower TSO standard through the amendment process set forth in <br /> this chapter. <br /> <br /> The TSOs related to mode split and average vehicle ridership are goals for achieve- <br /> ment by 2010. They need to be monitored and adjustments to the plan made if <br /> progress is not being made. Progress should be defined as increasing transit ridership <br /> and increasing average vehicle ridership. <br /> <br /> The TSOs should be monitored every two years. The following describes how each <br /> should be measured. Each jurisdiction should report the results of their monitoring <br /> activities to the TV TAC for review. Any TSO violations should be forwarded to the <br /> TVTC with recommended actions. <br /> <br /> Freeway Levels of Service. The TSOs are expressed both in terms of volume-to-capacity <br /> ratio (V/C) and hours of congestion. Volume-to-capacity ratio and hours of congestion <br /> can be measured with traffic counts or speed runs and should apply to mixed-flow <br /> lanes only. The plan uses a capacity of 2,200 vehicles per lane per hour (1,100 vehicles <br /> capacity for auxiliary lanes). Traffic counts can also be used to show duration of <br /> congestion. Freeway monitoring should be done by Caltrans or the CMA. <br /> <br /> Intersection Levels of Service. Intersection levels of service should be calculated using <br /> the VCCC program for AM and PM peak hours based on turning-movement counts. <br /> Intersection monitoring should be conducted by the jurisdiction in which the intersec- <br /> tion lies. The intent of the TVTP is to maintain the intersection TSO at all signalized <br /> intersections. However, to avoid extensive data collection, each jurisdiction should <br /> establish a list of critical intersections for monitoring. <br /> <br />Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc. 235 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.