My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
SR 06:097
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2006
>
SR 06:097
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/11/2006 3:53:20 PM
Creation date
4/11/2006 3:39:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
4/18/2006
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
SR 06:097
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
123
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Part VI-16 <br /> <br />Commissioner Fox believed that part of Ruby Hill was served by the Livermore School District. <br /> <br />Commissioner Roberts noted that the affected families go to schools in Pleasanton but cannot <br />vote for the Pleasanton school board. <br /> <br />Commissioner Fox wished to address the paragraph about the School District projecting a school <br />enrollment decrease, which projected its greatest overall enrollment for 2007 dropping off due to <br />aging population trends. <br /> <br />Commissioner Roberts did not believe that paragraph should be included. <br /> <br />Commissioner Fox expressed concern about the issue of school enrollment projections and <br />believed that the District should include that information in its strategic plan. She did not believe <br />that was an appropriate entry for this document. She would like the entire paragraph to be <br />stricken from the document. <br /> <br />Commissioner Roberts agreed and noted that the demographics changed every year. <br /> <br />Commissioner Maas noted that private schools were named and did not believe that was <br />appropriate because they were businesses. <br /> <br />Ms. Stern noted that the inclusion of the school district projections were to gather information <br />and discover what issues would need to be dealt with over the General Plan horizon. <br /> <br />Commissioner Roberts believed the Housing Element included that information. <br /> <br />Ms. Stern noted that the schools were public facilities. <br /> <br />Commissioner Fox believed the enrollment information could ultimately be a disservice to the <br />City. <br /> <br />The Commissioners concurred that the School District language should be deleted. <br /> <br />The Commission generally agreed that private facilities should not be specifically named and <br />that public facilities should be named. <br /> <br />Page VI-]8 <br /> <br />Commissioner Blank would like to see language to encourage the Library to provide WiFi <br />service within the bounds of the library facility. He noted that it should also maintain internet <br />access via terminals for customers not equipped with WiFi. <br /> <br />EXCERPTS: PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES, February 22, 2006 <br /> <br />Page 8 of 10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.