Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Page VI-33 <br /> <br />Commissioner Fox suggested that a program connect the major parks via trails and pedestrian <br />walkways; she suggested that a new Program 16.21 be used for that goal. <br /> <br />Ms. Stern believed that would be a good addition to this element as well as to the Circulation <br />Element. <br /> <br />Page VI-34: <br /> <br />There were none. <br /> <br />Page VI-35 <br /> <br />Commissioner Blank noted that Program 21.3 should include a diversity element and in any <br />other programs where the City encourages development of services. <br /> <br />Page VI-36 <br /> <br />Commissioner Fox noted that with respect to Program 22.3 addressing high-quality childcare <br />centers and services instead of "parks," "public facilities" or "community facilities" should be <br />part of the language. <br /> <br />Page VI-37: <br /> <br />There were none. <br /> <br />Table VI-5 <br /> <br />Chairperson Arkin would like to see Pleasanton-specific ratios on this chart. <br /> <br />Mr. Wolfe pointed out that this chart was only a comparison between Pleasanton's facilities <br />versus national guidelines. <br /> <br />Commissioner Blank believed that Pleasanton could use more soccer fields but did not want <br />community needs to be overshadowed by national standards. <br /> <br />Commissioner Maas agreed that City-specific standards should be identified. <br /> <br />Commissioner Fox would like a General Plan listing of amenities the City did not have, such as <br />toddler pools, that surrounding communities did have. <br /> <br />Commissioner Maas suggested that a wish list of future goals also be included in the General <br />Plan. <br /> <br />EXCERPTS: PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES, February 22, 2006 <br /> <br />Page 5 of 10 <br />