Laserfiche WebLink
<br />landscaping for new development be predominately native plant species in areas visible from <br />Foothill Road. Lawn or turf areas in landscape schemes adjacent to Foothill Road should be <br />either eliminated or hidden by native landscaping. The majority of the trees on the subject site <br />are located in the up-sloped area outside of the proposed development, except for four trees (one <br />coast live oak and three California bay laurel) would be impacted. Among the four affected <br />trees, three are located behind the proposed house on Lot 3, not visible from Dublin Canyon <br />Road. The area on Lot 3 abutting Dublin Canyon Road is to be designated as open space. A <br />condition is added requiring native landscaping be used. <br /> <br />WFRCOD requires that retaining walls visible from Foothill Road be faced with materials <br />compatible with the natural setting, such as natural stone or wood. Where feasible, retaining <br />walls should be stcpped. Landscaping shall be incorporated to minimize adverse visual impacts, <br />with planting in front of walls, within stepped recesses and/or overhanging the wall. Two three- <br />feet high retaining walls are proposed: one is located on Lot 3 behind the proposed house, and <br />the other retaining wall would be located on the side on Lot I. Given the location, the retaining <br />wall on Lot I may be visible from Dublin Canyon Road. The retaining wall on Lot 3 would be <br />hidden by the proposed house. A condition is added requiring the retaining walls on both lots be <br />faced with a natural materials. <br /> <br />WFRCOD requires opcn fcncing shall on the subject site, except that solid, privacy fencing may <br />be allowed in areas of a lot not within required yard areas if it is screened with landscaping. As <br />proposed, property line fences would be solid wood fence. <br /> <br />IV. PUD DEVELOPMENT PLAN FINDINGS <br /> <br />The Pleasanton Municipal Code sets forth the purposes of the Planned Unit Development (PUD) <br />District and the considerations to be addressed in reviewing a PUD dcvelopment plan proposal. <br />The Planning Commission must make the following findings that the proposed PUD <br />development plan conforms to the purposes of the PUD District, before making its <br />recommendation. <br /> <br />1. Whether the proposed development is in the best interest of the public health, <br />safety, and general welfare. <br /> <br />As conditioned, the proposed development would meet City standards for street <br />improvements and utility design. Adequate storm drain, sanitary sewer, and water <br />service utilities are present in the area surrounding the development and are sufficient to <br />serve the proposed development. All on-site infrastructures shall be installed by the <br />project developer with conncctions to municipal systcms in order to serve the site. The <br />project will generate traffic loads that can be accommodated by the existing City streets <br /> <br />Case No. PUD-44 <br /> <br />Planning Commission <br /> <br />Page - 10 - <br />