Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Page I of I <br /> <br />Marion Pavan <br /> <br />Sent: <br />To: <br /> <br />From: Maria Hoey <br /> <br />Thursday, June 22, 2006 8:02 AM <br /> <br />Donna Decker; Marion Pavan; Anne Fox (E-mail); Arne F. Olson (E-mail); Brian Arkin (E-mail); Gregory M. <br />O'Connor (E-mail); Jennifet Pearce (E-mail); Phil Blank (E-mail) <br /> <br />Subject: FW: Trenery Drive access <br /> <br />---Original Message----- <br />rom: hans [mailto:hans@destinycomp.com] <br />ent: Wednesday, June 21, 2006 9:06 PM <br />0: Maria Hoey <br />ubject: Trenery Drive access <br /> <br />nfortunately I did not have the time to attend the last meeting, but I understand you are proposing a path leading to Trenery <br />tive. This is a surprise to me since Trenery is a private road with no public easements. Also, it would seem extremely negligent <br />, direct school children onto a lOad that does not have a sidewalk, does not have street lighting, and does not have a speed limit <br />IS proven by the ass.... that drives down our road at about 65+ mph). Furthermore, such a plan will require the city to take <br />,sponsibility for all liability of non Trenery residents including and not limited to, accidents, road maintenance, and vandalism and <br />ter. The concept seems absurd since a few residents have already suggested to install a main gate at the entrance of Trenery to <br />ock unwanted traffic. <br />Also, we feel that Ponderosa's original plan is fair. If anything, we would like to see larger lots and slightly larger homes, <br />'eferably single story on the outskirts and two story in the center. <br /> <br />lank you. <br /> <br />ans Wiest <br /> <br />ease also forward this email to the head planner for this project and the planning commission. <br /> <br />22/2006 <br />