My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
SR 06:242
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2006
>
SR 06:242
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/12/2006 2:05:17 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 1:09:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
10/17/2006
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
SR 06:242
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
348
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />. before/after views taken from several viewpoints, <br />. an aerial perspective of the site, <br />. the project site plan superimposed on an aerial photograph of the site and surrounding <br />area, and <br />. tree growth looking up the main access street. <br /> <br />An additional feature is the before/after view looking up the project street, which includes an <br />animation of the tree growth continuously over a IS-year time period. Based upon the view <br />analyses, the project will be most visible looking north from Foothill Road at the intersection of <br />Old Foothill Road, and will be partially visible to portions of the Laguna Oaks neighborhood. <br /> <br />Staff believes that the view analyses provide an accurate modeling of the project. However, <br />staff also believes that the analyses should be revised to include the views of the tree growth - as <br />an animation or at designated time intervals - and re-submitted to the Planning Commission for <br />its review with the tentative subdivision map. The purpose of this re-submittal is to provide to <br />the Planning Commission the opportunity to review the proposed landscaping treatments along <br />the north and south sides of the development to determine their effectiveness at screening the <br />project. The staff recommendation is reflected as draft condition of approval. <br /> <br />Where building designs will be governed by design guidelines, absent actual design plans, the <br />preparation of accurate view studies is difficult. Staff, therefore, has conditioned the proposed <br />project to provide computer generated view studies with the site-specific design plans. <br /> <br />Traffic and Circulation: <br /> <br />Eight dwelling units, generating a total of 80 trips during the 24-hour day and 8 trips during the <br />a.m./p.m. peak commute hour, is considered to be a less-then-significant addition of traffic to <br />the surrounding street system. Therefore, no traffic analysis was required for the proposal. <br /> <br />The projeet developer will be required to: <br /> <br />. Pay the City and Tri- Valley Traffic Impact Fees; <br />. Construct a left-turn lane/pocket from northbound Foothill Road to Old Foothill Road; <br />. Construct a right-turn deceleration lane from southbound Foothill Road to Old Foothill <br />Road; and, <br />. Reconstruct the Foothill Road/Old Foothill Road intersection to a 900 alignment and <br />standard street intersection to improve circulation. <br /> <br />All proposed aceess driveways and public streets will be designed and constructed to City stan- <br />dards. <br /> <br />Item 6.c., PUD-58 and PGPA-II <br /> <br />Page 27 of 34 <br /> <br />August 23, 2006 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.