SR 06:242 - Laserfiche WebLink

Page I of2 Marion Pavan From: Sandeep Duggal [sduggal@mba1994.hbs.edu] Sent: Thursday, August 24, 2006 3:32 PM To: Marion Pavan; Jerry Iserson Subject: RE: Meadowlark Hello Marion. I am back in town now and heard that the meeting was postponed. I trust you did not need the area residents at this meeting also? Please treat my earlier communication send to you on July 28 as my input to the process and the basis for which I am supporting it. Should any of the key aspects of the plan presented to us, such as the density, screening trees or the long- term open space designation change, I would be very interested in knowing, as I am sure, would all the other residents in the vicinity of the Meadowlark project. Hope all went well at the meeting. Sandeep Marion Pavan <MPavan@Cipleasanton.ca.us> wrote: Dear Sandeep: The Austin project will be reviewed by the Planning Commission at its August 23rd public hearing. A copy of the photo simulations can be sent to you once I have received the final copy. I can check, but I don't believe that any simulations were actually taken from the Jorgensen Lane properties, Let me get back to you on this. Marion Pavan Associate Planner -----Original Message----- From: Sandeep Duggal [mailto:sduggal@mba1994.hbs.edu] Sent: Saturday, July 29, 2006 1:42 AM To: brad-equity@sbcglobal.net Cc: Marion Pavan; Jerry Iserson; Sandeep Duggal Subject: Meadowlark Pleasanton, CA July 29, 2006 Dear Brad: Thank you for your letters keeping the Foothill Area residents appraised on the developments related to the Austin Property and Meadowlark. As you know, I, like many of my neighbors, came out in support of the development plan submitted by you and Charles Austin. This support was surprising to some in the community especially in view of the proposed development's density being different than the General Plan for the Austin property (low density residential of 1 dwelling per 5 acres). 9/22/2006