My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
SR 06:242
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2006
>
SR 06:242
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/12/2006 2:05:17 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 1:09:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
10/17/2006
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
SR 06:242
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
348
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Preliminary Tree Report, 3459 Foothill Rd., Pleasanton <br />Apri12,2004 <br /> <br />HortScience, Inc. <br />Page 1 <br /> <br />Introduction and Overview <br />Equity Enterprises is planning to develop a residential project at 3459 Foothill Rd. in <br />Pleasanton California. Two residences, outbuildings and open rangeland currently occupy the <br />site. Equity Enterprises has proposed two possible project designs, the main difference <br />between the two being their placement on the sne. In Design A eight lots extend from a <br />central road along the northem swale. This requires removal of outbuildings, grading of a <br />portion of the site, installation of a road and construction of new homes and related <br />infrastructure. In Design B eight lots are located along the southem property line, requiring <br />grading of a portion of the site, installation of a road and construction of new homes and <br />related infrastructure. <br /> <br />HortScience, Inc. was asked to prepare a Tree Report for the site for review by the City of <br />Pleasanton. This report provides the following information: <br /> <br />1. A survey of trees within the proposed project area. <br />2. An assessment of the impacts of constructing either proposed design on the trees. <br />3. Estimation of trees to be removed and preserved. <br /> <br />Survey Methods <br />Trees were surveyed in February 2004. The survey included trees greater than 6". The <br />survey procedure consisted of the following steps: <br /> <br />1. Identifying the tree as to species; . <br />2. Tagging each tree with an identifying number and recording its location on a map; <br />3. Measuring the trunk diameter at a point 54" above grade; <br />4. Evaluating the health and structural condition using a scale of 1 - 5: <br />5 - A healthy, vigorous tree, reasonably free of signs and symptoms of disease. <br />with good structure and form typical of the species. <br />4 - Tree with slight decline in vigor, small amount of twig dieback, minor <br />structural defects that could be corrected. <br />3 - Tree with moderate vigor, moderate twig and small branch dieback, thinning <br />of crown. poor leaf color, moderate structural defects that might be <br />mitigated with regular care. . <br />2 - Tree in decline, epicormic growth, extensive dieback of medium to large <br />branches, significant structural defects that cannot be abated. <br />1 - Tree in severe decline, dieback of scaffold branches and/or trunk; most of <br />foliage from epicormics; extensive structural defects that cannot be abated. <br />5. Rating the suitability for preservation as "good", 'moderate" or 'poor". Suitability <br />for preservation considers the health, age and structural condition of the tree <br />species, and its potential to remain an asset to the site for years to come. <br /> <br />Good: Trees with good health and structural stability that have the <br />potential for longevity at the site. <br />Moderate: Trees with somewhat declining health and/or structural defects <br />than can be abated with treatment. The tree will require more <br />intense management and monitoring, and may have shorter life <br />span than those in 'good' category. <br />Poor. Tree in poor health or with significant structural defects that <br />cannot be mitigated. Tree is expected to continue to decline, <br />regardless of treatment. The species or individual may have <br />characteristics that are undesirable for landscapes, and generally <br />are unsuited for use areas. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.