My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
SR 06:242
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2006
>
SR 06:242
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/12/2006 2:05:17 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 1:09:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
10/17/2006
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
SR 06:242
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
348
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />United States Army Corps of Engineers Nationwide Permits <br /> <br />In contrast, projects that result in impacts of less than one-half acre and/or less than 300 linear <br />feet may be authorized under one of the existing United States Army Corps of Engineers <br />Nationwide Permits (NWPs) if they meet all of the Nationwide Permit General Conditions. If the <br />project falls under the Nationwide Permit program and will result in greater than 0,10 acre of <br />impacts, a Pre-construction Notification (PCN) must be submitted to the United States Army <br />Corps of Engineers prior to discharging fill. The Nationwide Permit General Conditions require <br />that the project include provisions for the protection of federally- or state-listed Endangered or <br />Threatened species, water quality management; and construction practices that do not disrupt <br />movement of aquatic life, among other requirements. Additiona! r~gio!!E!! req!!!!'cme:lts fer <br />maintaining upland buffer areas between authorized projects and open waters or streams may be <br />conditions for granting any United States Army Corps of Engineers permit. Therefore, activities <br />authorized under Nationwide Permits are often those projects that have minimal impacts to <br />wetlands, waters, and special-status species. If no federally- or state-listed Endangered or <br />Threatened species have the potential to occur in the project area, processing of Nationwide <br />Permits frequently takes 30 to 60 days. When listed species may be present in the project area, <br />the review and negotiation process may take up to six months or more. <br /> <br />Several regulatory agencies with commenting authority may provide input and specify permit <br />conditions during the United States Army Corps of Engineers' review of an Individual or <br />Nationwide Permit application. The agencies typically involved include the United States Fish <br />and Wildlife Service, State Office of Historical Protection, Environmental Protection Agency, <br />National Marine Fisheries Service (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration), and the <br />Regional Water Quality Control Board. <br /> <br />Because of the recent Supreme Court decision in Solid Waste Agency of Northern Cook County <br />v. US Army Corps of Engineers (SW ANCC), the United States Army Corps of Engineers no <br />longer takes jurisdiction over "isolated" wetlands and waters. The United States Army Corps of <br />Engineers does take jurisdiction over "adjacent wetlands," which are hydrologically connected to <br />navigable waters or tributaries of navigable water, even if such wetlands appear to be otherwise <br />"isolated." In response to the federal agency not taking authority over the isolated wetlands, the <br />Regional Water Quality Control Board takes authority over "waters of the State." Therefore, the <br />result is that all wetlands and waters in California are regulated by either the United States Army <br />Corps of Engineers or the Regional Water Quality Control Board, or both. In creek or river <br />systems, the Regional Water Quality Control Board takes jurisdiction similar to the California <br />Department of Fish and Game, from top of bank to top of bank (Figure 2). Many applicants have <br />misunderstood the SW ANCC decision, especially in the context of the State's authority and the <br />ability of the United States Army Corps of Engineers to take jurisdiction over "adjacent <br />wetlands." <br /> <br />Regardless of the permits required, careful project design and efforts to avoid and minimIze <br />impacts to special-status species and wetland resources will streamline the permitting~rocess <br />......J ~.b.ulL'....uJJ UJI}-H....V..... LW... 1Il'l..'-'JlIIVVU I..H la.plU PIUJt:U a~J1uval. f'\llnougn the Umte States <br />Army Corps of Engineers is primarily concerned with biological resources associated with <br />jurisdictional wetlands or waters, special-status upland species are frequcntly addressed in the <br />United States Army Corps of Engineers permitting process and these species and impacts to their <br />habitat should also be avoided during project planning. The regulatory guidelines require a <br /> <br />Sycamore Associates LLC - Regulatory Permitting Implications 05/06/04 <br /> <br />7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.