My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
SR 06:242
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2006
>
SR 06:242
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/12/2006 2:05:17 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 1:09:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
10/17/2006
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
SR 06:242
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
348
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Meadowlark Development - Austin Property - Environmental Checklist <br /> <br /> Less Than <br /> Potentially Significant Less Than <br /> Significant With Mitigation Significant No <br />Issues Impact Incorporated Impact Impact <br />TransDortation and Traffic <br />Would the project: <br />a) Cause an increase in traffic, which is substantial in re- O 0 [K] 0 <br /> lation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the <br /> street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in ei- <br /> ther the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capac- <br /> ity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections)? <br />b) Excecd, either individually or cumulatively, a level of [J 0 [R] 0 <br /> service standard established by the county congestion <br /> management agency for designated roads or high- <br /> ways? <br />c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including ci- D D 00 D <br /> ther an increase in traffic levels or a change in location <br /> that rcsults in substantial safety risks? <br />d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature D D 00 D <br /> (e,g" sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or in- <br /> compatible uses (e,g" farm equipment)? <br />e) Result in inadequate emergency access? 0 0 [K] 0 <br />f) Result in inadequate parking capacity? 0 0 0 [K] <br />g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs 0 0 [K] 0 <br /> supporting alternative transportation (e,g., bus turn- <br /> outs, bicycle racks)? <br />Discussion <br />a,b,c) The addition of 8 trips during the a,m.lp,m, peak hour is considered negligible, The project's <br /> payment of City and Tri-Valley Traffic Impact Fees is considered to be its mitigation. There- <br /> fore, this impact is considered to be a less-than-significant. <br /> <br />d-e) Public street access is provided directly from Old Foothill Road and indirectly from Foothill <br />Road. All access driveways and public strects are designed to City standards, The project de- <br />veloper will construct a left-turn lane/pocket from northbound Foothill Road to Old Foothill <br />Road, and street improvements on Old Foothill Road as required by thc City Engineer. There- <br />fore, this would be a less than significant impact. <br /> <br />PGP A-ll/PUD-58/PTR-7813 <br /> <br />Page 33 of 36 <br /> <br />July 19.2006 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.