My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
SR 06:242
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2006
>
SR 06:242
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/12/2006 2:05:17 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 1:09:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
10/17/2006
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
SR 06:242
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
348
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Foothill Road, backed by the Pleasanton Ridge, and adjoining opcn space land. They provide <br />detailed and comprehensive landscape and building design standards - diagrams, photographs, <br />and drawings - addressing materials, massing, architecturc, planting, etc., for clear guidance to <br />future owners regarding their custom home designs. <br /> <br />Public Improvements and Traffic Mitigation <br /> <br />A northbound lcft turn pocket will be constructed in Foothill Road to Old Foothill Road with thc <br />proposed project. The location of the devclopment's access from Old Foothill Road will be co- <br />ordinated with the driveway opcning to the Alviso Adobc Park. The central portion of Old <br />Foothill Road will bc closed, either with bollards or cul-de-sacs, so as to integrate the Alviso <br />Adobe Park site with the proposed open space arca and to prevent through traffic on Old Foot- <br />hill Road. <br /> <br />Construction Phasing <br /> <br />The proposed project will be constructed in two phascs. Phase One will include the public in- <br />frastructure including thc street and cul-de-sac, mass grading for the lots, bio-retention <br />pond/swalcs, perimeter landscaping in the open space area, and the shared access driveways. <br />Phasc Two will includc the custom homes, individually lot-by-Iot or mass developed by a single <br />developer, <br /> <br />VII. ANALYSIS <br /> <br />General Plan <br /> <br />The Pleasanton Gencral Plan designates the Austin property for Rural Dcnsity Residential land <br />uses, with a maximum and midpoint dcnsity of 1.0 dulS.O acres equaling 6 units for the subject <br />property. However, the proposed gross density for this development is 8 dwelling units, requir- <br />ing an amendment to the Pleasanton General Plan changing the land usc designation from the <br />Rural Density Residcntial land usc designation to Low Density Residential (< 2 dulac) on 8 <br />acres, with a maximum of 8 units, and Agriculturc and Grazing on the remaining 22 acres. Fig- <br />ure 7 on the following page shows thc proposed land usc changes superimposed on the devclop- <br />ment plan. <br /> <br />Staff notes that the Planning Commission should makc the finding that the proposed amendment <br />to the Pleasanton General Plan conforms to thc applicable policies and standards of the Pleasan- <br />ton General Plan for hillside development. The cluster concept of the proposcd development <br />plan fulfills the applicable policies and standards of the Pleasanton General Plan for hillside dc- <br />velopment for the following reasons: <br /> <br />. Although the Low Density Residential land use designation would allow for a maximum <br />density of 16 dwelling units, this land use dcsignation will be limited to a density of 8 <br />dwclling units. Thcrefore, any changes of density - for example, increasing the density <br /> <br />Item 6.c., PUD-58 and PGPA-ll <br /> <br />Page 12 of34 <br /> <br />August 23, 2006 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.