My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
SR 06:245
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2006
>
SR 06:245
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/3/2006 12:28:34 PM
Creation date
11/3/2006 12:20:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
11/7/2006
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
SR 06:245
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
265
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Page I of I <br /> <br />Natalie Amos <br /> <br />From: <br />Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2006 10:22 AM <br /> <br />To: Natalie Amos <br /> <br />Subject: 779 Mirador Court <br /> <br />Hello Natalie, <br />Did you have a chance to find out about the Gloria Court home remodel that was denied by city planners, <br />aparently because it obstructed neighboring views? <br />Also, the applicants at 779 Mirador Court did put up three poles in their backyard yesterday to demonstrate the <br />elevation. But I'm unsure if the two lower poles approximate the level of the windows and also, was there <br />supposed to be one more pole at the extreme western end of the yard toward Tim Bennet's home to show the <br />extent of the remodel's width? <br />Incidentally, just based on the one elevation pole, their remodel wouldn't merely obstruct our view. It would <br />destroy it. And if, as I fear ,the shorter pole is supposed to show where the windows would be, they would be well <br />above our fence line with a direct line of sight into the kitchen, family room, and two of the three bedrooms in our <br />home. If you recall, the architect, Mr. Shuilt, had stated during our meeting that the windows would not have a line <br />of site into our backyard and residence. He stated that the windows would look into our fence. <br />I also have been reading zoning review guidelines on the city's website. Under the scope of the review, it <br />specifically states that planners' review should include "preservation of views enjoyed by residents." There also is <br />a proviso citing "relationship of exterior lighting to its surroundings" because the second story addition would also <br />affect the lighting coming into our home. <br />It is troubling to me to see these clauses in the city's zoning section and to know that the neither the applicants <br />nor the archiect at any time ever bothered to consider the impact on neighboring homes. As I believe I told you <br />before, there was never a word of consultation from these applicants and the architect prior to the city's <br />notification that this remodel plan was in the works. <br />Sincerely, <br />Dennis and Barbara Georgatos <br /> <br />6/9/2006 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.