My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
SR 06:245
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2006
>
SR 06:245
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/3/2006 12:28:34 PM
Creation date
11/3/2006 12:20:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
11/7/2006
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
SR 06:245
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
265
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Page I of I <br /> <br />Natalie Amos <br /> <br />From: Ron Imperiale<<' <br />Sent: Thursday, April 20, 2006 9:16 PM <br />To: Natalie Amos <br />Cc: , - <br />Subject: Knight appeal (PADR-1472). <br /> <br />-. .. <br /> <br />! <br /> <br />Natalie: <br /> <br />Forever the optimist I still think there is room to compromise! <br /> <br />I suggest that the Knights consider building and paying for a fence extension to the properties involved in this <br />appeal. This extension would probably appease all parties involved and expedite the building process which could <br />drag on and become cost prohibitive and weather restrictive. <br /> <br />The cost could be incorporated in the proposed addition and be nominal in the big picture of the project <br />(financed). It is the only thought I can think of that could possibly satisfy all parties. The Knight's could have their <br />cake and eat it too. <br />This would also retain the neighbors relationships and expedite their project. <br /> <br />I am open to discussion on this proposal and I would be willing to champion this thought to the other neighbors. <br /> <br />I am also in support of the appeal that Dennis & Barbara Georgatos have filed, and will oppose this project, until <br />resolution and satisfaction has been reached for the majority of the neighbors no matter how far or long we must <br />continue this appeal or process. <br /> <br />We as neighbors can and will appeal this project until a mutual resolution is reached. We have no limit or time <br />restrains on this project. We simply desire the consideration and understanding, and a compromise from the <br />Knights that will be acceptable to all concerned and a resolution that will quench our requests and desires for the <br />neighborhood. <br /> <br />Please convey these thoughts to the Knights. You may also invite the Knight's to open a dialogue with (me) us. <br />The other alternative is to continue the progress thru the City's required beauracy, which we all no can be <br />cumbersome, prolonged and inevitably expensive.. <br /> <br />Regards; <br /> <br />Ron Imperiale <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />6/9/2006 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.