My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
SR 06:245
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2006
>
SR 06:245
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/3/2006 12:28:34 PM
Creation date
11/3/2006 12:20:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
11/7/2006
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
SR 06:245
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
265
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Page lof2 <br /> <br />Natalie Amos <br /> <br />From: <br /> <br />Ron Imperial <br /> <br />Tuesday, April 25, 2006 9:56 PM <br /> <br /> <br />Sent: <br />To: <br />Cc: Jerry Iserson; martha wensel; Natalie Amos; tim bennet~ <br />Subject: Re: Planning Commission hearing <br /> <br />To all concerned: <br /> <br />The dates listed are contradictory, what is the date of the hearing 6/10/06 or 6/14/06? <br /> <br />We agree that the story poles should be re-installed at all elevations of the proposed project so the staff may <br />better visualize the scope of the project and its impact ( as requested by the Georgatos family). We also request <br />that a (neutral party with no involvement) perform a shading analysis and report of all properties affected, and <br />submit that report to the staff. <br /> <br />We also request a direct involvement as volunteered by Mr. Iserson in resolution to this proposal. <br /> <br />This project may pass certain criteria set by the design committee, but it surely contradicts the cities past <br />decisions and concern for the communities involved. Easements and grants have been issued for these <br />circumstances and proposals in the past. Why is this an exception, when it has more impact than the homes <br />granted these easements? <br /> <br />Mr. Iserson, please involve yourself in this project as you have so graciously volunteered. You will help the city <br />rebuff these projects that push the scope of additions and preserve our cities character. I would also like to state <br />that the city will lose additional tax revenue for each of these projects that are approved. <br /> <br />If the Knight's can afford to add a house upon a house then they can truly afford a new home in Pleasanton. They <br />are simply trying to beat the taxes and have no consideration of the neighbors or the neighborhood.. This is <br />evident and documented as they never consulted "a single neighbor on East Angela" prior to their proposed <br />project permit application. <br /> <br />If anyone ever needed the support of their city, we the neighbors of this project do! <br /> <br />This project will set a precedent for future outlandish expansion, beat the taxes and turn Pleasanton into <br />something our fore fathers never envisioned. Stacy Knight stated (" Get used to it, it is the sign of the times"). <br /> <br />The Families involved have an aggregate of 95 years of residency in Pleasanton, is our concern not woth a <br />consideration and review? <br /> <br />Respectfully; <br /> <br />Ron & Pat Imperiale <br /> <br />~~~--- . <br /> <br />Sent: Tuesday, April 25,200610:14 AM <br />Subject: Fwd: Planning Commission hearing <br /> <br />Dear neighbors, <br />Just to let you know, we formally filed an appeal of the Zoning Administrator's approval of the <br />Knight's two-story remodel. I received a request from the city to delay the hearing until June 10, <br /> <br />6/9/2006 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.