Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Page I of2 <br /> <br />Natalie Amos <br /> <br />From: Natalie Amos <br />Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2006 11 :25 AM <br />To: 'ron imperiale' <br />Subject: RE: Stacy Knight (PADR-1472) <br /> <br />Dear Mr. Imperiale, <br /> <br />I would like to know if you would be able to meet on February 15 at 4:00P. Another possible date may be <br />Tuesday, February 21 at 4:30P. I would also like to inform you that a Zoning Administrator (ZA) hearing for this <br />project has been scheduled for March 9 at 3:30. The ZA hearings take place at the Planning and Community <br />Development Departmenllocated at 200 Old Bernal Avenue. I would like the applicant and concerned neighbors <br />to meet before the hearing, February 15 or the 21st, so that comments and/or questions can be addressed in a <br />timely manor. <br /> <br />I would also like to set up a time to meet with you at your home, before the meeting and ZA hearing, so that I can <br />better address your concerns. Should you have any questions or comments, please do not hesitate to contact <br />me. <br /> <br />Sincerely, <br /> <br />Natalie Amos <br /> <br />Natalie E. Amos <br />Assistant Planner <br />CITY OF PLEASANTON <br />(925) 931-5613 <br /> <br />Planning and Community Development <br />PO Box 520 <br />Pleasanton. CA 94566 <br /> <br />-----Original Message----- _ <br />From: - _ . ] <br />Sent: Monday, February 06, 2006 6: 12 PM <br />To: Natalie Amos <br />Subject: Stacy Knight (PADR-1472) <br /> <br />Thank you for your notification on the proposed addition to 779 Mirador Crt. I am completely againest the <br />this proposal for the fOllowing reasons, and there for request a modification of plans to eliminate the <br />second story portion of the addition. <br /> <br />1. The neighborhood was not designed to have a second <br /> <br />story home it that specific location. <br /> <br />2. The privacy of my home would be compromised. This <br />eye sore. <br />This would leave our bedrooms and rear portion of the <br /> <br />proposed addition would be intrusive and an <br /> <br />home no privacy. <br /> <br />3. There would be a negative impact on future property <br />them. <br /> <br />values. No one wants an obstruction facing <br /> <br />6/9/2006 <br />