Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Page 1 of2 <br /> <br />Natalie Amos <br /> <br />From: Natalie Amos <br />Sent: Wednesday, August 09, 2006 6:12 PM <br />To: 'Martha Wensel' <br />Subject: RE: Remodel question <br /> <br />Martha, <br /> <br />My summer has been going well and I hope that your's too has been going well. To answer your <br />question, the following regulation applies to R-l zoning districts (your neighborhood): <br /> <br />In an R-1 district, at the time of initial construction, main structures exceeding fifteen feet <br />(15') in height shall be separated by a distance of at least twenty feet (20'); provided, <br />however, portions of two (2) structures, only one of which is in excess of fifteen feet (15') in <br />height, shall be separated by at least seventeen feet (17'), Additions to the main structure <br />may be constructed with the same setback as the existing first floor setback. Drovided that <br />the addition does not encroach any farther into the setback than does the existing main <br />structure_ <br /> <br />http://66.113.195.234ICA/Pleasanton/index.htm (Title 18, Chapter 18.84.100 Yards and Courts <br />Related to Height of a Structure) <br /> <br />For example, if the Knights were proposing to "bump out" the side portion of their first floor, closest to <br />your home, and add a second floor on top of that "bump out", then that second story portion would <br />have to maintain a 17-footside yard setback from your existing single-story home. As it states above, <br />since the side yard setback is continuous with the existing side yard, not encroaching into the existing <br />setback, the separation regulation doesn't apply. If you wanted to do a second story addition, the <br />separation wouldn't apply to your addition if you weren't changing the existing setback as well. If <br />there was a second story on the Knights home and you wanted to "bump out" the side portion of your <br />first floor and do a second story addition over that first floor "bump out" then the 20-foot separation <br />would apply to you. If you maintained a continuous side yard setback, as the Knights are, then you <br />wouldn't have too. Your ability to expand in the future, should it be desired, will not be reduced and <br />you could even have a similar proposal as the Knights. Based on the information you provided, it <br />sounds as if your friend was encroaching into the existing setback and that is why the separation is <br />required for them. <br /> <br />In regards to the mediation, dates and times haven't been determined yet. I unfortunately do not have <br />much information on it because that process is going to be determined by the Community <br />Development Director and the mediator. I will pass your out of town dates on to them though so that <br />they can take them into consideration during the scheduling. I hope that I have answered your <br />questions, but if not please let me know. <br /> <br />Sincerely, <br /> <br />Natalie E. Amos <br />Assistant Planner <br />CITY OF PLEASANTON <br />(925) 931-5613 <br /> <br />10/3/2006 <br />