My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
SR 06:287
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2006
>
SR 06:287
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/3/2007 4:25:02 PM
Creation date
12/13/2006 3:40:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
12/19/2006
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
SR 06:287
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
109
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Kerry Lamson noted that Condition No. 15 referred to maintenance equipment noise, and he <br />believed the intention was to do the decibel measurements around the structure. <br /> <br />Acting Chairperson Fox requested that Condition 24 be modified to include decibel levels, <br />as well as event center noise. <br /> <br />Mr. Lamson would like the general concern for traffic to be addressed, as well as what remedies <br />were available iftraffic were to become an issue. <br /> <br />THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED. <br /> <br />Acting Chairperson Fox inquired whether the Commission believed a 90-day review period <br />should be included in the conditions. <br /> <br />Ms, Decker believed the opportunity was in place with the use permit and the addition of a <br />condition that tightened it up if there were issues with parking, traffic, and noise, once decibel <br />levels could be measured. <br /> <br />Commissioner Blank proposed an amendment that if there was any change in ownership, <br />the couditional use permit would be brought back to the Commission. <br /> <br />Ms. Decker noted that a conditional use permit ran with the land and was not subject to <br />ownership changes. <br /> <br />In response to an inquiry by Commissioner O'Connor regarding whether Commissioner Blank <br />may have meant a change of use, Commissioner Blank noted that a change of use may be <br />considered. He had seen instances where a property had changed ownership, and a cooperative <br />local businessowner may be replaced by a large, out-of-town corporation that may not be as <br />interested in being a good neighbor. <br /> <br />Ms. Harryman noted that she had not seen that kind of condition before and reiterated that use <br />permits ran with the land. She noted that any subsequent owner would be aware of the <br />appropriate conditions and rules that came with the use permit. <br /> <br />Commissioner Blank withdrew his proposed amendment. <br /> <br />ROLL CALL VOTE: <br /> <br />AYES: <br />NOES: <br />ABSTAIN: <br />RECUSED <br />ABSENT: <br /> <br />Commissioners Blank, Fox, O'Connor, Olson, and Pearce. <br />None. <br />None. <br />None. <br />None. <br /> <br />EXCERPTS: PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES, October 25, 2006 <br /> <br />Page8of9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.