My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
23
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2007
>
011607
>
REGULAR MEETING
>
23
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/25/2007 12:07:47 PM
Creation date
1/11/2007 3:15:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
1/16/2007
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
23
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
157
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />DRAFT <br /> <br />In response to Acting Chairperson Fox's inquiry regarding the total acreage of the property and <br />the sizes of the three lots on Rheem Drive, the Church location, and the lot between the Church <br />and Nielsen Park, Mr. Otto replied that the total site is 12 acres, but since the three lots are not <br />individual lots, the actual sizes ofthe three lots were not readily available and would need to be <br />measured to determine their exact acreages. He added that the applicant may have that <br />information. <br /> <br />Acting Chairperson Fox noted that the City of Livermore, which had similar Code requirement, <br />had reduced the height of the gymnasium at the Cedar Grove Church project to 30 feet. She <br />inquired why a variance would be needed to maintain the 34-foot height of this gymnasium and <br />whether it could be similarly reduced to 30 feet. Mr. Otto noted that he would not be in a <br />position to comment on Livermore's Code requirements. With respect to this project, he stated <br />that the applicant required 25 feet of inside clearance for basketball use, and beyond that, the <br />structural requirements included beams, roof slope and duct work for air conditioning and <br />heating. For aesthetic reasons, the applicant designed the walls to extend an additional three feet <br />beyond the roofline. <br /> <br />Ms. Decker added that the parapet would screen the photovoltaic system panels that the Church <br />may eventually install on the roof. <br /> <br />THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED. <br /> <br />Father Dan Danielson, Pastor, Catholic Community of Pleasant on, 3999 Bernal Avenue, <br />described the history of this application and noted that the Church's current facility had become <br />cramped and overcrowded. He described the past plans for staff and other office space, a chapel <br />for smaller services and daily mass, and the large church and parking lot. The proposed <br />development addressed the needs of the Church and its service to the community, including the <br />community center. He noted that the Church currently had youth groups and divorce and <br />bereavement groups meeting in chapel space rather than in a separate meeting space. He noted <br />that their Catholic Youth Organization (CYO) basketball program service children throughout <br />the community from third to eighth grade and that through this project, the Church tried to fulfill <br />its commitment to the youth. <br /> <br />In response to Acting Chairperson Fox's inquiry regarding why the Church decided to place the <br />building next to Rheem Drive rather than at its original location on the 1998 Master Plan, <br />Fr. Danielson noted that in the first plans in 1989, nothing was proposed for that space because <br />the intent then was to sell that piece to help pay for the building of the Church. The revised 1998 <br />Master Plan included a building on the site; however, the entire property was brought into the <br />planning process, and based on the community's needs as they developed, the Church felt that <br />the space would not be large enough for a school, given the needs of present elementary schools. <br />He added that should a school be built in the future, the eastern portion of the property between <br />Nielsen Park and the Church would be sufficient for the necessary buildings as well as a play <br />area. <br /> <br />Commissioner Fox noted that it might make sense to build the gymnasium at the eastern portion <br />as should the school be built eventually, both buildings would be in the same location, and the <br /> <br />DRAFT EXCERPTS: PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, November 29, 2006 <br /> <br />Page 3 of II <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.