Laserfiche WebLink
CONCLUSION <br />Staff believes that as conditioned, the proposed development will be attractive. The applicants, <br />in staff's opinion, satisfactorily addressed all of the standards and guidelines of the Vineyard <br />Avenue Corridor Specific Plan for this area, including architectural and landscape design <br />criteria, grading, geotechnieal concerns, etc. Therefore, staff believes this will be an attractive <br />addition to the City's neighborhoods and is consistent with the Vineyard Avenue Corridor <br />Specific Plan. <br />STAFF RECOMMENDATION <br />Staff recommends that the Planning Commission: <br />1. Find that there are no new or changed circumstances or information which require <br />additional CF,QA review of the project; <br />2. Find that the proposed PUD development plan is consistent with the General Plan, the <br />Vineyard Avenue Corridor Specific Plan, and purposes of the PUD ordinance; <br />3. Make the PUD tindings as listed in the staff report; and, <br />4. Adopt a resohition recommending approval of Case PUD-56 subject to the conditions of <br />approval as shown in F,xhibit B. <br />Sta/JPlnnner Rohin Gijjin, phone: (925) 93/-5612 or e-n:uil: rgiffrn(c~c•i.pleasanton.ca.as <br />p(Ip-56.Lnininn pC Report <br />Case No. PUD-56 <br />Plunnirtg Commis:~~ion <br />Page - 17 - <br />