My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
18 ATTACHMENTS
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2007
>
032007
>
REGULAR MEETING
>
18 ATTACHMENTS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/25/2007 1:50:29 PM
Creation date
3/16/2007 2:59:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
3/20/2007
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
18 ATTACHMENTS
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
165
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Page 1 of 1 <br />Jenny Soo <br />From: mike.serrano <br />Sent: Friday, November 03, 2006 11:52 AM <br />To: jsoo@ci.pleasanton.ca.us <br />Subject: Trinity Lutheran Expansion <br />To the Planning Commission for the City of Pleasanton <br />Dear Commissioners, <br />As you prepare to revisit Trinity Lutheran's application for conditional use permit at next week's (Nov. 8~h) <br />meeting. I would like to provide you an update on the progress or lack there of since your workshop on the issue <br />on September 13~h, 2006. <br />At the September 13~h meeting, a number of neighbors, myself included, addressed the commission regarding our <br />concerns over the potential traffic impact the proposed design would have on the neighborhood. <br />The commissioners, in workshop, requested that staff and the church go back and look at a number of possible <br />alternatives to address the neighborhoods concerns. These included: 1. closing the Golden Road exit, 2. <br />connecting the Del Valle Parkway and Golden parking lots, 3. Modifying the size of the building, 4. Repositioning <br />the building, 5. Creating a Hopyard driveway. <br />Following the workshop, there have been two meeting between the church and the neighbors (that I'm aware of). <br />The first one included City Staff. Sadly, I need to report that both meetings failed to produce any meaningful <br />discussion on the topics suggested by the commissioners at the workshop. The attached email "Re: Thank you" <br />was the email exchange after the first meeting. After receiving an invitation to a second meeting with the Church <br />("Trinity Follow-up #3), I attended the meeting cautiously optimistic that we could make progress on our traffic <br />concerns. Unfortunately, the invitation email was all hype as the meeting quickly reverted to discussing the <br />current plan- no changes or modifications. <br />The neighbors have tried to work with the church. We have shared our concerns, our presentations, and our <br />comments. I asked the church for copies of their presentations, video tapes of the public meetings, and I have <br />received nothing. We are not opposed to the pre-school, but we are very concerned with the potential 280%+ <br />increase in traffic through our neighborhood. <br />I would like to point out that maps the city has provided of the Hopyard/Golden Road intersection are incorrect. <br />The map, including the map on the back of the Notice of Public Hearing, are of the old street configuration before <br />Hopyard was reconfigured some years back creating a frontage road that parallels Hopyard. The current <br />configuration makes the Hopyard/Golden intersection a very complex intersection with no traffic control. <br />Since the Church has failed to adequately address the traffic concerns of the neighborhood, I respectfully request <br />that the Planning Commission deny Trinity Lutheran Church's application (PCUP-155/PDR-513). <br />Sincerely, <br />Mike Serrano <br />4835 Golden Rd. <br />3/13/2007 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.