02/12/69 - Laserfiche WebLink

.,. ~, he has confidence that the developer would do a fine job. Still maintains he would like to nee some larger lots interspersed with the smaller ones. Commissioner Arnold feels that as far as the multiple are concerned, this will be a matter of the Design Review Board to approve or deny, feels that the multiple, however, does fit in with the development. Commissioner Garrigan liked the concept. He feels that changes are ,needed and that thin is a step in the right direction. The multiple is acceptable to him, that it does not present any aesthetic problems. Commissioner Antonini stated that the developer, in cutting down the density, also cut down the multiple and cut out the commercial. In its place, he has added trailer and boat space and increased the aideyards of the single-family dwellings to 15 and 17 ft. Feels the Commission should be very strict on the concept for the multiple but that he endorsed the development. Chairman Plato basically agreed with the rest of the Commissioners. Is impressed with the architecture but would like to get lees than 100 units in the multiple area. Upon motion of Commissioner Garrigan, seconded by Commissioner Arnold, and carried; the following resolution was offered. RESOLUTION N0. 859 A resolution of the Planning Commission of the City of Pleasanton, recommending to the City Council the modification of Zone Change #69-4, filed by Fred Falender, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Pleasanton, has considered Zone Amendment Petition X69-4, filed by Fred Falender, to amend Sec. 4.102, Zoning Ordinance No. 520, to change the zone district designation from A (Agricultural) District to a P.U.D. (Planned Unit Development) District, that property described ae follows: Assessor's Map Book 941, Block 950, Parcel 1-2, and Block No. 1000, Parcel 2-2, containing approximately 72.60 acres, Town of Pleasanton WHEREAS, said Commission has held a Public Hearing on this petition and has examined the pertinent maps,` drawings and documents and finds that one or more of the following conditions do exist: 1. That the proposed amendment will not be contrary to the spirit and intent of the General Plan, 2. That the proposed amendment is in the public interest and general welfare, 3. That the proposed amendment creates a more equitable condition for the community than now prevails. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT BESOLVED, that the Planning Commission of the City of Pleasanton hereby recommends to the City Council the modification of said zone change amendment as petitioned. PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE Planning Commission of the City of Pleasanton on the 12th day of February, 1969, by the following vote: AYES: Commissioner Antonini Commissioner Arnold Commissioner Garrigan Commissioner Gibbs ChettmahcP2ato NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST: Secretary Castro - 10 -