Laserfiche WebLink
PUD-65 Environmental Checklist <br />f) There is no adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan or <br />other approved local, regional or state habitat conservation plan and, thus, this issue is not <br />applicable to this project. Therefore, this would be no-impact. <br />5. CULTURAL RESOURCES <br />Environmental Setting <br />The subject site is not located in an area identified as having site-specific archeological, <br />paleontological, or geologic features or resources. The City of Pleasanton has, however, <br />experienced development locations where archeological resources have been found in the form <br />of Native American burial sites. <br />Standards of Significance <br />For purposes of this environmental document, an impact is considered significant if the proposed <br />project would: <br />• Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical or archeological <br />resource as defined in the CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5; or, <br />• Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic <br />feature. <br />Less Than <br />Potentially Sid iticant Less Than <br />Significant With Mitigation Sio itccant No <br />Issues Impact Incorporated Impact Impact <br />Cultural Resources <br />Would the project: <br />a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the ~ ~ ~ ~X <br />significance of an historical resource as defined in <br />X15064.5? <br />b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the ~ ~ ^X <br />significance of an archaeological resource <br />pursuant to § 15064.5? <br />c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique <br />Paleontological resource or site or unique <br />geologic feature? <br />d) Disturb any human remains, including those ~ ~ ~X <br />interred outside of formal cemeteries? <br />14 <br />