13 ATTACHMENTS - Laserfiche WebLink

PUD-65 Environmental Checklist Discussion a) The subject site contains an existing dilapidated single-family home and accessory building, both of which would be demolished. These structures are not considered historical resources nor listed on the California Register of historical Resources. Therefore, this would be a no impact. b-d) There are no known archaeological or paleontological sites identified on the subject site. There could be previously undiscovered subsurface resources present. Should subsurface resources be found upon excavation, all work will be required to be halted whereby the City shall be immediately notified. Necessary measures, such as consulting an. archaeologist, would take place prior to construction resuming. This requirement will be made as a condition of the project approval. Therefore, this would be a less-than- significant-impact. 6. GEOLOGY AND SOILS Environmental Setting The subject properties have already been graded in conjunction with the prior developments. The existing developed portions of the properties generally have flat terrain. The northern perimeter of the site has gently sloping terrain. Project specific grading for the proposed project would be limited to that required for preparation of the building pad and foundation, parking lot, and drive aisles. Standards of Significance For purposes of this environmental document, an impact is considered significant if the proposed project would: Result in a project being built that will either introduce geologic, soils, or seismic hazard by allowing the constriction of the project on such a site without protection against those hazards. Less 'Iran Potentially Significant Less Than Sio ificant With Mitigation Significant No Issues Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Geolo6y and Soils tiYoaild tlae project: a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: 15