My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
17 ATTACHMENTS
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2007
>
090407
>
17 ATTACHMENTS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/30/2007 5:17:02 PM
Creation date
8/30/2007 5:16:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
9/4/2007
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
17 ATTACHMENTS
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
325
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
While the Commission has generally not supported the payment of fees, it can be justified based <br />on the uniqueness of the proposed Oak Grove project and the general unsuitability of the site to <br />accommodate units that are appropriate as affordable housing. The uniqueness of the project <br />relates primarily to the severe topography of the land and the location of the 562-acre site <br />relative to the developed areas of the City. In order to maximize the sensitivity of the grading <br />and minimize visual and environmental impacts, streets and lots will be fitted to the topography, <br />resulting in linear clusters of lots along several ridges and valleys. There would be no single, <br />large developable area that would be suitable for higher density development of the type that <br />could accommodate approximately I0 affordable units. <br />In addition, the proposed project includes 482 acres of permanent open space that would include <br />more than 25,000 lineal feet (about 4.7 miles) of regional and local trails accessible to the <br />public. <br />Summary <br />The developer's proposal provides an opportunity for the development of 20 income restricted <br />ownership or rental units from a development that would otherwise most likely pay the LIHF. <br />As a result, the proposal represents an opportunity to have affordable units built. The IZO was <br />specifically designed to place a high priority on obtaining actual affordable units as part of new <br />residential projects whenever practical and reasonable. However, in developing the IZO, the <br />City also acknowledged that there would be some future projects in which an alternative to <br />providing affordable units might be necessary. Hence, the IZO includes several alternatives <br />(outlined earlier in this report) that can be considered by the Commission/City Council in lieu of <br />constructing affordable units. <br />Staff believes that the Oak Grove project is the type of development in which the application of <br />off-site units is appropriate and warranted. This is based primarily on the fact that on-site units <br />are not practical considering some of the projects unique features including: <br />• Topography and location of the site <br />• Design of the land plan to maximize sensitivity to the site <br />• 482 acres of permanent open space <br />Staff Recommendation <br />Staff recommends that the Commission recommend approval of the developer's proposal to <br />satisfy the City's inclusionary requirement by the use of off-site units as outlined above. If the <br />Commission approves the developer's proposal staff will incorporate the concept into the <br />development agreement and into the affordable housing agreement that will be forwarded to the <br />City Council as part of the project approval documents. <br />Page - S - <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.