CCMIN031996 - Laserfiche WebLink

Ms. Michelotti questioned whether there was really a difference in light from a ten foot or fifteen foot pole. Mr. Swift indicated the tilt of the light will have to be changed and if properly screened will have no effect on the neighbeE. The roll call vote was as follows: AYES: Councilmembers - Dennis, Michelotti, Mohr, Pico and Mayor Tarver NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None At 11:15 p.m. Council discussed what items would still be discussed. It was determined that Item 6d would be considered and the remainder of the agenda will be continued to April 2, 1996. There will be a workshop for discussion of the LAVWMMEBDA item at 4:30 p.m. on Wednesday, March 20, 1996, in the City Manager's conference room. No action will be taken on that item until April 2, 1996. Item 612) -- PUD-909-%2M. Peter Shutis AV!)lic~tion for a planned unit development ma_ior modification and development plan a_ _oproval for a 41-room. 82 resident. senior care facility located at 41 115 Mohr Avenue. Zonins~ for the profile_ is PUD (Planned Unit Development~ - C-O (Commercial-Of~ce~ District. (SR 96:89) Brian Swift presented the staff report. Peter Shutts, 4133 Mohr Avenue, Suite G, appeared for the applicants to answer any questions. Mr. Tarver asked if the soundwall had been recommended by staff or did Council add it as a condition of approval of the first application. Mr. Swift indicated it was agreed upon by the developer and the neighbors. At that time, traffic volmes were higher because Stoneridge had not been extended and the noise was higher because of the surface condition of Mohr Avenue. Ms. Michelotti asked if the soundwall had ever been part of the City's capital improvement consideration. Mr. Swift said the growth management report identifies all areas in the city that have rear yard wooden fences next to streets and those are proposed for soundwalls at some point in the future. 03/19/96 -20-