My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN091796
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
1990-1999
>
1996
>
CCMIN091796
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/26/2010 10:53:55 AM
Creation date
5/13/1999 11:14:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Tarver referred to the photographs presented of other shopping centers and asked <br />if there were multiple signs for those locations and what were the size of the signs? <br /> <br /> Mr. Swift described the signs at the various locations. He also described the evolution <br />of the monument signs with three names on them. <br /> <br /> Jack Hovingh, 4250 Muirwood Drive, expressed concern with the number of signs in <br />Pleasanton and cited examples of stores that may come forward with requests for more signage. <br />The Farmers Market does amazingly well with no signs at all. He felt one sign on Santa Rita <br />Road should be adequate for the Safeway Shopping Center and urged Council to reject the <br />appeal. <br /> <br /> Mr. Smith provided a copy of the site plan to demonstrate the location of driveways and <br />discussed turning movements to get into the parking lot. <br /> <br /> Mr. Pico asked if Mr. Smith had a choice between one twelve-foot sign on Santa Rita <br />and two eight-foot signs, which would he choose. <br /> <br /> Mr. Smith did not think an eight-foot sign was adequate for Santa Rita Road. <br /> <br /> There being no further testimony, the public hearing was closed. <br /> <br /> Ms. Dennis felt other stores would request additional signs if this variance were granted. <br />The only sign she could support would be a low directional sign to indicated the location of the <br />driveway. That should be reviewed by the Planning Commission. <br /> <br /> Ms. Michelotti thought that because of the tree cover and the reorienting of the Safeway <br />store that there is valid reasoning to have some additional signage. Because of the findings set <br />forth in the staff report, there is a difference from other shopping centers and she agreed with <br />Ms. Dennis that the sign should be reviewed by the Planning Commission. However, she felt <br />there needed to be identification of Safeway and Walgreens on the smaller sign on Valley. Just <br />saying "entrance" was not sufficient. The only way she could support the variance was because <br />there was a clear understanding that there were differences in this shopping center than others. <br /> <br /> Ms. Dennis did not think there were substantial differences and reiterated her desire to <br />have Planning Commission input. <br /> <br /> Mr. Pico felt the Safeway building is very visible from Santa Rita Road and did not think <br />the existing trees obscured the store. The shopping center that includes Gene's Fine Foods is <br />similar; there is a service station on the comer and mature trees in the parking lot and he <br />predicted there would be an application from them for additional signage. He was opposed to <br />a twelve-foot sign on Valley Avenue. He would consider a smaller sign on Valley if the Santa <br /> <br /> 09/17/96 <br /> -14- <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.