Laserfiche WebLink
12 <br /> <br /> Property Tax and Jail Bookinq Fees <br /> <br /> Ms. Acosta informed the Council that the Alameda County Board <br /> of Supervisors had passed the property tax and jail booking fees. <br /> <br /> 13. REPORTS OF THE CITY ATTORNEY <br /> Item 13a <br /> Settlement of Pleasant Villaqe Associates v. City of Pleasanton and <br /> Related Claims for Damaqes <br /> <br /> Mr. Roush presented his report (SR 91:14) regarding the <br /> matter. <br /> <br /> Mr. Henry Hatton, 3963 Fairlands Drive, owner of the property <br /> immediately adjacent to the Pleasant Village Associates Complex, <br /> stated that Mr. Thomas should not get a $29,000 settlement from the <br /> City because he violated the provisions of Measure X. He proposed <br /> that Mr. Thomas get his relief from his architect, who also did the <br /> Measure X plans. <br /> <br /> Mr. Hatton then pointed out that the uses allowed under <br /> Measure X does not include video stores and, therefore, the video <br /> store should not be allowed to exist in the complex. He added that <br /> neither Measure X nor the City ordinance defines "fast food <br /> restaurants" and that although the City has always considered <br /> eating places with tables and chairs as sit-down restaurants even <br /> if food is offered for take out, some restaurants that allow <br /> seating, like McDonald's and Burger King, are considered fast food <br /> restaurants. He made the distinction that in "fast food <br /> restaurants," customers order food at the counter while in "sit- <br /> down restaurants," customers sit down and are served. He <br /> recommended that the City look into the possibility of hiring an <br /> outside consultant, to be paid for by the proponents of Measure X, <br /> to define "fast food restaurants." <br /> <br /> Mr. Hatton also mentioned that many trucks still park on <br /> Pimlico Drive and suggested that a fine be included in the "No <br /> Truck Parking" sign to discourage truck parking. <br /> <br /> Mr. Mercer requested staff to look into the matter. <br /> <br /> Mr. Tarver indicated that he could not support the resolution <br /> because he does not believe that Mr. Thomas has no responsibility <br /> in the matter. <br /> <br /> - 12 - <br /> 1-8-91 <br /> <br /> <br />