Laserfiche WebLink
It was moved by Councilmember Wood, and seconded by Councilmember Mercer, that <br />Resolution No. 83-520, denying the request of James and Elaine Sonne for annexation <br />of their property at 510 Happy Valley Road, and directing staff to advise the Sonne's <br />that this request will again be considered for annexation after completion of the <br />Happy Valley Annexation Study, be adopted. <br />The roll call vote was as follows: <br />AYES: Councilmembers Brandes, Mercer, Mohr, Wood, and Mayor Butler <br />NOES: None <br />ABSENT: None <br /> <br />Request from County of Alameda for Sewer Capacity for Castlewood <br /> Mr. Walker presented his report (SR 83:516) dated November 15, 1983, regarding <br />this matter. <br /> <br /> It was moved by Councilmember Mercer, and seconded by Councilmember Brandes, that <br />Resolution No. 83-521, instructing the City Manager to write a letter to the Alameda <br />County Director of Public Works stating: (1) Pleasanton does not have excess capacity <br />in the planned 3.1 MGD expansion to allocate 92,000 GPD to Castlewood; (2) a total of <br />39,000 GPD capacity is now available in Pleasanton's existing capacity for Castlewood; <br />and (3) that Pleasanton and Dublin San Ramon Services District are initiating a study <br />to determine the best alternative to provide the wastewater disposal needs of the <br />Valley to the year 2000, and that capacity for Castlewood will be included in the <br />study if requested by the County, be adopted. <br />The roll call vote was as follows: <br />AYES: Councilmembers Brandes, Mercer, Mohr, Wood, and Mayor Butler <br />NOES: None <br />ABSENT: None <br /> <br />ReGuest to Waive Growth Management Fees and Lower Income Housing Fund Fees for Valley <br />~za' V'il!ages II <br /> Mr. Walker presented his report (SR 83:517) dated November 16, 1983, regarding <br />this matter. He corrected his report to read 32 low income units instead of 26 low <br />income units to be set aside for lower income families. <br /> <br /> Councilmember Mohr stated that with the change in time frame to 15 years retention <br />for rental units, she is opposed to any waiver of fees. <br /> <br /> After discussion, it was moved by Councilmember Mercer, and seconded by Council- <br />member Brandes, that Resolution No. 83-522, waiving the $525 per unit Capital Improve- <br />ment Fund fee and the $400 per unit Low Income Housing Fund fee for the 25 percent of <br />the project set aside for lower income families for 15 years (32 units) for Valley <br />Plaza Villages II, and amending the growth management resolution (Resolution No. 82-66) <br />accordingly, be adopted. <br /> <br /> It was moved by Councilmember Mohr, and seconded by Councilmember Wood, that the <br />motion be amended to state that the fees would be waived as long as the units remain <br />low income and that fees would be due and payable at the time the units cease being <br />low income units. <br />The roll call vote was as follows: <br />AYES: Councilmembers Mohr and Wood <br />NOES: Councilmembers Brandes, Mercer, and Mayor Butler <br />ABSENT: None <br /> <br />The roll call vote on Resolution No. 83-S22 above~ was as follows: <br />AYES: Councilmembers Brandes, Mercer, and Mayor Butler <br />NOES: Councilmembers Mohr and Wood <br />ABSENT: None <br /> <br /> 14. 11/22/83 <br /> <br /> <br />