Laserfiche WebLink
There being no further testimony, Mayor Mercer declared th~ public hearing closed <br />on this item. <br /> <br /> Councilmember Butler stated it had to be determined whether or not the downtown <br />parking code is appropriate, and in this case he could not make the finding that <br />this particular business is different from another ice cream parlour or other use, <br />therefore he could not Justify granting the appeal. <br /> <br /> Councilmember Kephart stated he could not vote in favor of the appeal because <br />of the lack of required parking spaces. <br /> <br /> Councilmember Mohr stated that most variance requests involve some kind of ex- <br />tension but this request is for the use of an existing building. She stated that <br />because it is an historical building it should be grandfathered in since it was <br />built before present codes were in effect. She stated that because she felt down- <br />town businesses should be encouraged and historical buildings preserved, she is in <br />favor of granting this appeal. <br /> <br /> Mayor Mercer stated that downtown Pleasanton is unique, and that there are park- <br />ing problems. He stated he felt this particular business would not have any signi- <br />ficant adverse impact on the parking and traffic problems in this area. Re added <br />that this is not a political issue. <br /> <br /> It was moved by Councilmember Kephart, and seconded by Councilmember Butler,. that <br />Resolution No. 81-349, after determining that appropriate findings could not be <br />established, deny the appeal of Robnotre Steffen of a decision of the Board of <br />Adjustment denying a variance to allow the establishment of an ice cream shop at <br />163 West Neal Street without providing off-street parking for the business, the <br />property is zoned C-C (Central Commercial) District, be adopted. <br />The roll call vote was as follows: <br />AYES: Councilmembers Butler, Kephart, and Wood <br />NOES: Councilmember Mohr and Mayor Mercer <br />ABSENT: None <br /> <br />Application of Pleasanton Properties Company to convert tWenty-six rental dwelling <br />units to condominiums. These units are located at 811 through 847 Division Street <br /> Mr. Harris presented his report (SE 81:357) dated October 6, 1981, regarding <br />this matter. <br /> <br /> Mayor Mercer declared the public hearing open on this item. <br /> <br /> Mr. Harry Fish, representing Pleasanton Properties, stated he concurred with the <br />staff report. <br /> <br /> Mr. Steve Hughes, 587 Tonriga Court, asked Council not to allow any conversion <br />of apartments to condominiums. He state<| the tenants had not been properly repre- <br />sented; that the landlords have more rights than the tenants. He stated he was <br />opposed to condominium conversion. <br /> <br /> There being no further testimony, Mayor Mercer declared the public hearing closed <br />on this item. <br /> <br /> After discussion, it was moved by Councilmember Butler, and seconded by Council- <br />member Kephart, that this application meets or will meet all the requirements of the <br />ordinance and that there has been no rent increase to occupants of units on the sub- <br />Ject property during the six month period preceding this approval; therefore, Resolu- <br />tion No. 81-350, approving the application of Pleasanton Properties Company to con- <br />vert twenty-six rental dwelling units to condominiums located at 811 through 847 <br /> <br /> 13. 10/13/81 <br /> <br /> <br />