Laserfiche WebLink
/" 121 <br /> <br /> Division Street, be adopted, subject to the following conditions: (1) that the <br /> process of conversion be in compliance with the provisions of Chapter 15, Title <br /> II of the Ordinance Code of theCity of Pleasanton (CondominiumConversion Projects); <br /> (2) that two parking spaces per unit be provided for the project to be located and <br /> installed in a manner approved by the Planning Division; (3) that the structural, <br /> heat loss, and acoustic characteristics of the project be evaluated by certified <br /> experts who shall furnish recommendations in writing as to how, if necessary, the <br /> project can be modified to meet the current standards enforced by the City as found <br /> in the 1979 Uniform Housing and Uniform Building Codes and Title 24 of the California <br /> Administrative Code; (4) that the subdivision be processed either through the stan- <br /> dard parcel map or tentative and final map procedures of the city; (5) that ~he <br /> developer be aware that additional requirements of subdivision may include but shalX <br /> not necessarily be limited to dedication to Alameda County Flood Control of that <br /> portion of the subject property from the top of bank of the Arroyo del Valle t~ <br /> property line within the channel, submittal of an on-site existing utility plan, <br /> submittal for approval by the City of the project CC&R's and an agreement that the <br /> homeowners association shall be responsible for the payment of water and sewez' fees; <br /> (6) that prior to filing a final or parcel map, the developer shall execute am~ <br /> cord an agreement incorporating the terms and conditions of the conversion approval <br /> binding the developer and any successor in interest to provide the assistance to <br /> tenants and to improve the project in accordance with Chapter 15 of the Ordinamce <br /> Code of the City of Pleasanton, the agreement shall be recorded and a copy shall be <br /> provided to each tenant occupying a unit on the date of approval of the condomini~m, <br /> conversion project, the agreement shall run to the benefit of any tenant occupFin~ a <br /> unit on the date of the approval of the condominium conversion project and may re- <br /> quire bonds to assure the completion of improvements in accordance with project <br /> approval; and (7) that there may be additional fire safety requirements under ~he <br /> 1979 Uniform Fire Code beyond those contained in the 1979 Uniform Building Code as <br /> adopted and enforced by the City. <br /> The roll call vote was as follows: <br /> AYES: Councilmembers Butler, Kephart, Mobr, Wood, and Mayor Mercer <br /> NOES: None <br /> ABSENT: None <br /> ~pplication of Marshall and Louise Perry~ et al,..to convert. save.pry-three rental <br /> dwelling units to condominiums. These units are located at 2451 throuF~h 2.}29 Santa <br /> Rite Road <br /> Mr. Harris p~ented" his report '(SR 81':358) acted OCtober '6, 198i, ~egar'ding""this <br /> matter. <br /> <br /> Mayor Mercer declared the public hearing open on this item. <br /> <br /> Mr. Cil Bathes, 147 Bernal Avenue, representing the applicant, stated the rents <br /> were raised last month at these apartments. He stated that Mr. Perry, St., was not <br /> aware of the requirement relating to this matter. Mr. Barbee stated that Mr. Perry <br /> would rebate the rent and would like permission to raise the rent $25.00 for c;ost of <br /> living expenses since it had been over a year since the rent had been raised. <br /> <br /> Councilmember Mohr asked if the apartments were short eighteen parking spaces. <br /> Mr. Barbee advised there was always ample parking and at the time the complex was <br /> built, it was over-built for parking. He requested a waiver on the eighteen parking <br /> spaces. <br /> <br /> Mr. Marshall Perry, St., stated it bad only been ten months since the last rent <br /> increase. He explained that Marshall Perry, Jr., took care of a portion of the <br /> business for these apartments, and that he, Mr. Perry, St., was unaware of the <br /> ordinance prohibiting rent increases during the six month period preceding approval. <br /> <br /> 14. 10/13/8 <br /> <br /> <br />