Laserfiche WebLink
stated he had no problem with continuing the item but felt the public hearing <br />should be opened tonight to receive any testimony that the audience might want <br />to present. Council concurred. <br /> <br /> Mayor Mercer declared the public hearing open on this item. <br /> <br /> Mr. Steve Hughes, 3263 Vineyard Avenue, Space 110, representing a contingent of <br />tenants at the Hacienda Mobile Home Park, stated they support an ordinance to restrict <br />the conversion of rental condominiums. He requested that mobile homes be included in <br />the ordinance to protect the park tenants of their present life style. He added he <br />felt mobile homes should be given the same protection as apartments. <br /> <br /> Mr. Leo Heckathorn, 4202 Stanley Boulevard, asked if the State had control over <br />mobile home parks. The City Attorney advised the State has significant but not <br />exclusive control of mobile home parks. <br /> <br /> Sharon Church, representing the tenants of the Del Arroyo Apartments on Vineyard <br />Avenue, stated this group supports the proposed ordinance, and requested that the <br />rental apartments remain as rentals. <br /> <br /> Ms. Sharon Shamblin, representing the tenants of the Del Prado apartments on <br />Hopyard Road, expressed concern regarding the rental situation and the possible <br />conversion of this apartment complex. She stated that the Del Prado tenants support <br />the proposed ordinance. <br /> <br /> Mr. William J. Beane, 4164 Golden Road, stated he supports the measure. He <br />stated that rents were being increased excessively and there was concern that the <br />apartments would be converted. He stated it is a matter for City Government to <br />control and he wanted reasonable rentals instead of having to buy a condominium. <br /> <br /> Ms. Debra Strong, representing the Chamber of Commerce, stated that the Chamber <br />was opposed to condominium conversions in the first place and that she had re- <br />ceived calls from several members asking that this item be continued until the <br />first meeting in February for additional input. She stated she was opposed to a <br />moratorium, and if one is adopted it should not be for any longer than necessary <br />or until an ordinance is adopted. <br /> <br /> Mr. Dwight J. Cate, 847 Division Street, Apt. 3, stated he used to be in favor <br />of an owner doing what he wanted to with his property, but times have changed. He <br />stated that property owners had received a tax break with the passage of Proposition <br />13 but the tenters had not bene£itted from this. He stated that in his complex most <br />of the tenants were unable to buy a home or condominium, and he felt rentals should <br />be made available at a reasonable price. <br /> <br /> Ms. Laura Philipe, 847 Division Street, stated that most of the tenants in this <br />complex were senior citizens who were unable to buy property. She stated she did <br />not want to be displaced. <br /> <br /> Mr. Chuck Weidel, Realtor, 5321 Mallard Drive, stated that affordable housing <br />in Pleasanton is not a simple problem. He stated that most of the input previously <br />received by Council had been from realtors and property owners. He suggested more <br />input needs to be received from senior citizens, tenters, and young people. He <br />stated he felt no action should be taken on this item tonight, and that the Council <br />consider a moratorium for whatever period necessary to resolve this issue. <br /> <br /> 6. 12/23/s0 <br /> <br /> <br />