My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN120799
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
1990-1999
>
1999
>
CCMIN120799
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/26/2010 10:53:17 AM
Creation date
1/19/2000 11:36:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
12/7/1999
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
agreement by asking for an advisory vote. Council is on record that it would support <br />direct injection of RO treated wastewater only as an absolute last resort. He believed <br />DSRSD was in the process of obtaining the final permits, and this is the only opportunity <br />to put a measure before the voters. The Protect Our Water committee cannot put an <br />initiative on the ballot unless it is countywide. He felt this was a reasonable action to <br />take. If he could have the word "sewage" inserted in the question, he would agree not to <br />sign any ballot arguments. <br /> <br /> Ms. Dennis asked for the ballot language options to be shown again. She <br />suggested "Should wastewater from treated sewage that has been further treated with <br />reverse osmosis technology be injected into the groundwater basin?". That makes clear <br />the origin and it says the wastewater has been further treated. <br /> <br />Mr. Pico liked that language. <br /> <br />Ms. Ayala wanted to insert drinking water in the sentence. <br /> <br /> Mr. Lum suggested adding at the end of the sentence "...groundwater basin that <br />serves as the potable (drinking water) supply for Pleasanton and the Livermore Amador <br />Valley." <br /> <br /> Ms. Michelotti asked for clarification that if the ballot language is acceptable, <br />then Councilmembers will allow the process to take place with no Councilmember <br />signing the ballot arguments. <br /> <br /> Mr. Pico said yes. He will campaign for his position, but will not sign an <br />argument. <br /> <br /> It was moved by Mr. Pico, seconded by Ms. Dennis, to adopt Resolution No. <br />99-140, authorizing placing on the March 7, 2000 regular election a City Council <br />sponsored advisory measure concerning public support for groundwater injection of <br />recycled water using reverse osmosis technology, directing the City Attorney to <br />prepare an impartial analysis of the initiative, authorizing arguments concerning <br />the measure, allowing rebuttal arguments regarding the measure, and requesting <br />Alameda County to conduct this election in conjunction with the March 7, 2000 <br />regular election, using the following ballot language: "Should wastewater from <br />treated sewage that has been further treated with reverse osmosis technology be <br />injected into the groundwater basin that serves as the potable (drinking water) <br />supply for Pleasanton and the Livermore Amador Valley." <br /> <br />The roll call vote was as follows: <br />AYES: Councilmembers - Ayala, Dennis, Michelotti, Pico, and Mayor Tarver <br />NOES: None <br />ABSENT: None <br />ABSTAIN: None <br /> <br />Pleasanton City Council 20 12/07/99 <br />Minutes <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.