Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Pico indicated he would not sign any ballot argument, for or against. The <br />remaining Councilmembers agreed. <br /> <br /> It was moved by Mr. Pico, seconded by Ms. Ayala, to direct staff to notify the <br />Regional Water Quality Control Board and Zone 7 of the fact that this action has <br />been taken, that the measure will be on the ballot in March, and ask that they delay <br />any decision on this issue until we get the election results. <br /> <br />The roll call vote was as follows: <br />AYES: Councilmembers - Ayala, Dennis, Michelotti, Pico, and Mayor Tarver <br />NOES: None <br />ABSENT: None <br />ABSTAIN: None <br /> <br /> Mr. Roush indicated the ballot arguments are due December 17, 1999 and the <br />rebuttal arguments will be due December 27, 1999. <br /> <br />Item 6e <br />Status Report on the Livermore Amador Valley Water Management Agency <br />(LAVWMA) Financing Plan for the Export Pipeline Project (SR 99:351) <br /> <br /> Mayor Tarver indicated he would have to leave the meeting, but wanted to <br />comment on the LAVWMA agreement. He and Mr. Pico have been working with the <br />DSRSD Liaison group and support the report and the next step in the financing plan of <br />the LAVWMA project. He wanted to dispel any potential rumors that they are causing a <br />problem in getting this done. <br /> <br /> It was moved by Mr. Tarver, seconded by Mr. Pico, to approve the tentative <br />agreement and process for completing the LAVWMA financial plan described in <br />the Liaison Committee Meeting Agenda dated November 30, 1999. <br /> <br />Mayor Tarver left the meeting at 11:20 p.m. <br /> <br />Mr. Lum presented the staff report. <br /> <br /> Mr. Pico indicated this has been reviewed with representatives from DSRSD and <br />with City staff and he believed that the level of risk to the Pleasanton ratepayers has been <br />reduced significantly and in the spirit of Measure U, we should proceed expeditiously to <br />get the expansion project under way. The final agreements will come back for approval, <br />but the project will proceed as expeditiously as possible. <br /> <br /> Peter MacDonald, 400 Main Street, supported Mr. Pico's comments. The <br />tentative agreement represents the details upon which the final agreement can be worked <br />out. In the spirit of Measure U, Council should approve this and we should move on. <br /> <br />Pleasanton City Council 21 12/07/99 <br />Minutes <br /> <br /> <br />