Laserfiche WebLink
land. The decision has been made and it is now time to move forward with the project. Council <br />has not investigated subsidizing people in hospital beds. The community has recognized there is <br />a need for an assisted living facility and there has been a determination that the City needs to <br />participate in the construction and the operation of those facilities. The City want to get <br />permanent affordability in addition to providing units available for market rate. The issue will <br />come back in terms of design of the facility, etc. At this point, the City is making a significant <br />commitment to proceed. <br /> <br /> Ms. Michelotti indicated that from the time the idea was conceived, either the land would <br />be used similar to what was done for Ridge View Commons, or there would be an RFP put out to <br />find an operator that would pay for the land. All those options were looked at from the very <br />beginning. The City did not just say here is an outright girl. Staff investigated several scenarios <br />and after much deliberation, to make it work, the current process was determined to be the best. <br /> <br /> Mr. Cordtz understood all that, but believed that SSI could no longer be provided and the <br />City does not want to get into the health care business. He knows what assisted living is and its <br />failures and problems. <br /> <br /> Mr. Bocian explained that when staffwas dealing with this issue and talking about the <br />land, the major concern staffhad was that the City would have to give up ownership of the <br />property. The current deal is structured so that the City retains owners of the property <br />throughout the life of the project and will get the property and improvements back at some point <br />in the future. <br /> <br /> Ms. McKeehan reiterated the position that the City does not want to get directly into the <br />health care business. <br /> <br /> Barbara Hempill, 4508 Eull Court, indicated she has been on the Assisted Living Sub- <br />Committee since its inception several years ago. This current design is really an improvement <br />over what was brought to Council three years ago. She believed Lytton Gardens is an excellent <br />operator of non-profit facilities. She indicated she had spoken with a women living in an <br />assisted living facility in Livennore and was told the cost is $4,000 a month. That is higher than <br />the proposed market rate units at the Pleasanton facility. She said having this facility close to <br />Ridge View Commons is as least disrnptive as possible to senior citizens. Statistics have shown <br />that when an elderly person is moved from one situation to another, they lose about 50% of their <br />condition. She urged Council to approve this project. <br /> <br /> Christine Steiner, 596 Hamilton Way, also a member of the Assisted Living Sub- <br />Committee, agreed this is a better project than previously proposed and this operator is also <br />much better. There is also a benefit because interest rates are low at this time and things will be <br />a little easier financially. She believed the 10% return on the City's money is admirable. The <br />need in the community is enormous. We are all getting older. It took a vision by the City <br />Council. Pat Belding and she attended a housing forum sponsored by the Commission on Aging <br />in Oakland. The other attendants were sttmned at the progress Pleasanton is making in this area <br />and wanted to know how the City can do it. She acknowledged there is a cost to serve the low <br />income families, seniors and other special needs. In this case, it is not a matter of"beds", these <br /> <br />Pleasanton City Council 10 <br />Minutes <br /> <br />11/06/01 <br /> <br /> <br />