My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN120302
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2002
>
CCMIN120302
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/17/2007 10:56:36 AM
Creation date
12/20/2002 9:12:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
12/3/2002
DOCUMENT NO
CCMIN120302
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
TTK Partnership was given a number of houses to pay for the infrastructure and that developer <br />was willing to meet the obligation to the Happy Valley Road residents. However, that is no <br />longer in the picture. She was also concerned about the lateral costs quoted to Sycamore <br />residents. This amount was much lower than currently stated. She was concerned about the pro <br />rata costs for the Sycamore residents. The infrastructure has been in place four years and she felt <br />staff should know what that pro rata cost is. <br /> <br /> Mr. Roush indicated TTK Partnership has agreed to pay for its share of the infrastructure, <br />about $141,000. <br /> <br />Ms. Hosterinan asked what the connection cost is for each existing household? <br /> <br /> Mr. Gmbstick said the estimate for hook-up, including connection fees, is between <br />$20,000-$24,000. <br /> <br /> Ms. McKeehan said these figures will continue to change as the connection fees change <br />at DSRSD and Zone 7. <br /> <br /> Ms. Ayala asked if staff had a fixed cost for the infrastructure in Sycamore, which was <br />installed by Greenbriar, and whether those costs were less than the new construction would be? <br /> <br /> Mr. Grubstick said staff had just received the backup information from G-reenbriar <br />regarding those costs. Staff is reviewing the information to det~mtine what the final number is <br />and acknowledged that it could be less. <br /> <br /> Mayor Pico noted that New Cities Development had not agreed to continue to finance the <br />infrastructure. <br /> <br />Ms. Ayala asked about the third developer. <br /> <br /> Mr. Roush said that was Black Mountain Development, the developer of the 34 golf <br />course homes. It has not expressed willingness to pay its share of the infrastructure. Staff is <br />continuing to encourage these developers to participate in the costs. <br /> <br /> James Kaschmitter, 6291 Alisal Street, said his property is three acres of flat, buildable <br />land. There is currently a very old house on the property, which has a redwood foundation. It is <br />located on one end of the property near the road. It is small and, despite extensive <br />improvements, still needs substantial work. He would like to construct a new house with <br />connection to the City sewer and use the existing house as a guest cottage. He did not feel it was <br />cost effective to connect the old house to the sewer. He had no intention to sell his residence. <br />He did not know which Option would apply to his situation. <br /> <br />Ms. Hosterman felt Option 3 would apply to his situation. <br /> <br />Ms. Ayala asked how he felt about annexation? <br /> <br />Pleasanton City Council 10 12/03/02 <br />Minutes <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.