Laserfiche WebLink
something that would happen at a later point in time, with the extension of the complete <br />sidewalk and the rebuilding of Dennis Drive all the way to Newton. Council can require <br />that the full length of Dennis Drive improvement be installed with this project. This <br />would require negotiations and discussions and potential condemnation of property and <br />reimbursement agreements. <br /> <br />The public hearing was opened. <br /> <br /> Deryl Sturdevant, 3705 Newton Way, stated his home is on the Newton/Dennis <br />comer. He thanked Couneilmembers who took the time to come into the neighborhood <br />and look at the situation. The street design is unique. The request/petition represents 30 <br />of the 36 residents living in the neighborhood. Two of the homes are unoccupied because <br />of pending sales and the other 4 are on vacation. He stated that this is not a new issue. <br />This is an issue that has been there for the 6 years he has lived in his home. The <br />neighbors do not feel it was an issue of not following the process. The process is very <br />good. The recommendations of the Planning Commission were to go forward. <br />Subsequent to the Planning Commission, the Traffic Committee pulled together a <br />community group of 6 people who met and their recommendation were street closures <br />and sidewalk installation all of the way around. They were told at that meeting there was <br />no need to go further, because it wasn't going to go before the City Council. They only <br />discovered that after the fact not only was Council going to vote on it, but that the <br />recommendation that was given by staff differed from the one that was given by the <br />Planning Commission. The neighborhood put together several recommendations. The <br />street going down Newton is 28', going around a 90° turn. At the comer it is 19'09" and <br />then there are markers in the street that vehicles mn over. At that point the road is 20' <br />wide and widens to 28' just past Pecan and continues to 30' at the stop sign. He pointed <br />on a map to the various places in the roads where the neighbors had concerns. The area <br />was metered 18 months ago during which 900 vehicles used this area in one day. Closing <br />a street will not force cut through traffic to another area because the only way they can <br />get students to school is using Stoneridge and Guzman. Various locations already have <br />the devices he was using as examples. The staff report indicates the orientation of the <br />garage doors to be added back into the document, showing the side garage door access be <br />the same as the other homes in the Walnut Glen Estates. He commented that the <br />neighbors wanted the traffic issue resolved once and for all. <br /> <br /> Mayor Pico said it appeared that the neighborhood issues were not with the <br />Petersons or their project. This is the fundamental issue and Council recognizes the <br />neighbors are concerned about the traffic safety issue. This is a separate issue. He <br />wanted to know what the neighbors concerns were with respect to the Peterson project, <br />other than the garage door. <br /> <br /> Mr. Sturdevant said at the Planning Commission meeting there were 10 speakers <br />who each welcomed the Petersons to the neighborhood. The neighbors have an issue <br />with the exact same traffic and safety issues that have been present for the past 6 years. <br />After numerous meetings with members of the Traffic Committee there is still no <br />resolution to the situation. They are requesting that the approval of the Petersons project <br /> <br />Pleasanton City Council 14 09.02.03 <br />Minutes <br /> <br /> <br />